View source for Resource:20755beb-0432-483f-b1a7-2c28f4a84964

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
|Is About=This blog describes some of the arguments against the case of the AAP's (American Academy of Paediatrics) change of policy's position in relation to infant male circumcision. The author of the blog suggests that whilst the evidence remains the same, institutions can 'cherry pick' findings to support their own conclusions.
|Important For=Human rights defenders; Clinical ethics consultants; lecturers; research students
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2012/08/the-aap-report-on-circumcision-bad-science-bad-ethics-bad-medicine/
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags
|Involves=AAP
|Has Timepoint=27/5/2013
|Has Location=USA
|Has Virtue And Value=Accountability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Cherry picking
|Related To Research Area=LS 07.11 - Medical ethics
}}