View source for Resource:C121dc7b-a1a1-4caf-86ae-c1b7855a0734

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do?
|Is About=Retraction Watch brings in questions on how to deal with one's publication when it is heavily relied on research that might contain errors or misconduct issues. A researcher was faced with a difficult dilemma when she realised that a large proportion of the papers on her review on vitamin D links to Parkinson's Disease had been retracted.
|Important Because=Reviews often serve as an important source of evidence in informing policy and practice. This factual case is a very interesting starting point for debate (universities, students, researchers, policy makers) on how to approach reviews and conclusions based on research that has been, for various reasons, retracted.
|Important For=Academic staff; Authors; Researchers; Journal editors
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://retractionwatch.com/2021/04/13/one-in-six-of-the-papers-you-cite-in-a-review-has-been-retracted-what-do-you-do/
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:1b777e40-9d7f-4ef4-a601-6be70c9e386a
}}
{{Tags}}