View source for Resource:C6893d43-209b-456a-b5f9-e059227155ef

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing
|Is About=This is a fictional case of a novice reviewer who, in writing her first book review, used her own substantive ideas but relied heavily on borrowing identical sentences and phrases from a professor’s published review. The professor whose review has been heavily plagiarised alerted the journal.
|Important Because=The case delivers yet another example of the many formats that plagiarism can take (see also Loui, 2002)<ref>Loui, M.C. (2002). Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct, ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 8: 529–539.</ref>. It is also a reminder of how easily and, often unintentional, breech of ethical guidelines can occur, especially by those less experienced in a field.
<references />
|Important For=Authors; Journal editors; Journal publishers; Junior researchers; Early career researchers
|Has Best Practice=The case provides some ideas of best practices in order to avoid such plagiarism allegations: 

a)      Create your own review model after you have read a number of different review examples, rather heavily relying on one single example

b)     Acknowledge that the book review model used relies heavily on XX’s review by referencing appropriately
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://www.asanet.org/teaching-learning/faculty/teaching-ethics-throughout-curriculum/case-67-definition-plagiarism-phrasing
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0
}}
{{Tags
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism
}}