Pages that link to "Important For:Journal editors"
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages link to Important For:Journal editors:
Displayed 50 items.
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing (← links)
- Multiple submission (← links)
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements (← links)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication (← links)
- Publishing complications and patient safety (← links)
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study (← links)
- Obstructive sleep apnoea (← links)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article (← links)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research (← links)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) (← links)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) (← links)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct (← links)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) (← links)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) (← links)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication (← links)
- Favoritism in the Editing Room (← links)
- Collaboration dispute (← links)
- Honest refereeing (← links)
- Publication and data ownership (← links)
- Fabrication and falsification (← links)
- Eigenfactorizer (← links)
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings (← links)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" (← links)
- Eigenfactor (← links)
- Preprint servers (← links)
- Consent for publication (Author) (← links)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers (← links)
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. (← links)
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports (← links)
- Consent for publication (Participant) (← links)
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors (← links)
- Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication (← links)
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did (← links)
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review (← links)
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals (← links)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review (← links)
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? (← links)
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia (← links)
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? (← links)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance (← links)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” (← links)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill (← links)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals (← links)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias (← links)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) (← links)
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective (← links)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity (← links)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity (← links)
- Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript (← links)
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable (← links)