Pages that link to "File:Icon-discussions.svg"

The following pages link to File:Icon-discussions.svg:

Displayed 50 items.

• Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Declaration of Geneva (file link) ‎ (← links)
• European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (file link) ‎ (← links)
• The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed) (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. (file link) ‎ (← links)
• The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (file link) ‎ (← links)
• COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Consent for publication (Participant) (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Recognition and Networking (file link) ‎ (← links)
• UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (file link) ‎ (← links)
• The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did (file link) ‎ (← links)
• ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud (file link) ‎ (← links)
• ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job (file link) ‎ (← links)
• On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” (file link) ‎ (← links)
• “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Human Research Violations By  Eye Doctor Showcase A National  Problem (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review (file link) ‎ (← links)
• A bullshit excuse? My lab notebook “was blown into a manure pit” (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical? (file link) ‎ (← links)
• FDA Inspections Revealing Research Misconduct Hidden from Public View (file link) ‎ (← links)
• In the matter of J Hendrik Schön (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Official notice published for chem paper slated for retraction in 2011 (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Template:EvaluationGeneral (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Template:EvaluationTrainings (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Template:EvaluationResources (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Template:EvaluationThemes (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet (file link) ‎ (← links)
• What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Dutch psychology fraudster avoids trial (file link) ‎ (← links)
• A Letter of Resignation (file link) ‎ (← links)
• You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues (file link) ‎ (← links)
• You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues (file link) ‎ (← links)
• You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Materials scientist up to nine retractions (file link) ‎ (← links)
• One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? (file link) ‎ (← links)
• The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Columbia grad student faked data in study of socioeconomics and life experiences, says retraction notice (file link) ‎ (← links)
• Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance (file link) ‎ (← links)