Difference between revisions of "Theme:F9a8ff8e-3f72-482f-81a8-6d7300037161"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Principles & Aspirations |Title=Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility |Is About=The rise of digital psychiatry bring...")
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
# '''Ethical AI Governance:''' The European AI Act aims to address bias, transparency, and fairness in digital mental health tools, setting an example for global regulation.
 
# '''Ethical AI Governance:''' The European AI Act aims to address bias, transparency, and fairness in digital mental health tools, setting an example for global regulation.
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
# Galderisi S, Appelbaum PS, Gill N, et al. Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs. ''World Psychiatry''. 2024;23(3):364-386. doi:10.1002/wps.21230
 +
# Torous J, Roberts LW. Needed Innovation in Digital Health and Smartphone Applications for Mental Health: Transparency and Trust. ''JAMA Psychiatry''. 2017;74(5):437-438. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0262
 +
# Gooding P, Kariotis T. Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review. ''JMIR Ment Health''. 2021;8(6):e24668. Published 2021 Jun 10. doi:10.2196/24668
 +
# Torous J. A path towards progress: lessons from the hard things about digital mental health. ''World Psychiatry''. 2022;21(3):419-420. doi:10.1002/wps.21003
 +
<references />
 
{{Related To}}
 
{{Related To}}
 
{{Tags}}
 
{{Tags}}

Revision as of 21:08, 18 February 2025

Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility

What is this about?

The rise of digital psychiatry brings both opportunities and ethical challenges. Technologies such as AI-driven diagnostics, mental health apps, and telepsychiatry services promise greater accessibility, but they also raise concerns about privacy, trust, equity, and bias. The lack of unified governance and ethical oversight makes it crucial to examine the implications of these advancements.

Why is this important?

Digital psychiatry is reshaping mental health care by increasing accessibility and offering new treatment tools. However, significant ethical dilemmas arise, including the risk of AI bias, potential breaches of privacy, the impact of digital therapies on traditional face-to-face care, and concerns over data security. A lack of robust ethical scrutiny and regulatory frameworks leaves many questions unanswered. Understanding these issues is critical for ensuring that digital psychiatry develops in a way that respects human rights, safeguards vulnerable populations, and promotes equitable access to mental health care.

For whom is this important?

What are the best practices?

  1. Telepsychiatry and Remote Mental Health Services: These have expanded access to care but also raise concerns about reduced patient-provider trust and accountability.
  2. AI in Diagnosis and Treatment: AI models used for mental health assessments may be biased due to non-representative training data, leading to disparities in care.
  3. Privacy and Data Protection: Cases like the BetterHelp data-sharing controversy highlight the risks of commercial exploitation of sensitive mental health information.
  4. Mental Health Apps: While thousands of apps offer support, many lack clinical validation, raising questions about efficacy and misinformation.
  5. Ethical AI Governance: The European AI Act aims to address bias, transparency, and fairness in digital mental health tools, setting an example for global regulation.
  1. Galderisi S, Appelbaum PS, Gill N, et al. Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs. World Psychiatry. 2024;23(3):364-386. doi:10.1002/wps.21230
  2. Torous J, Roberts LW. Needed Innovation in Digital Health and Smartphone Applications for Mental Health: Transparency and Trust. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(5):437-438. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0262
  3. Gooding P, Kariotis T. Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(6):e24668. Published 2021 Jun 10. doi:10.2196/24668
  4. Torous J. A path towards progress: lessons from the hard things about digital mental health. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(3):419-420. doi:10.1002/wps.21003

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6