Difference between revisions of "Theme:Af676916-8a83-443a-aece-66abb3e9054f"
(mobo import migrateAll) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Important Because=The ultimate goal of science is to seek truth at the realm of material things. Because of that, science itself cannot be practiced without somehow tapping into the field of epistemology. Ideally, researchers should be attentive, careful, thorough, impartial, open, willing to exchange ideas and aware of their own fallibility (2). These traits could serve as a preventative measure for research misconduct and other, various practices that are detrimental to science. | |Important Because=The ultimate goal of science is to seek truth at the realm of material things. Because of that, science itself cannot be practiced without somehow tapping into the field of epistemology. Ideally, researchers should be attentive, careful, thorough, impartial, open, willing to exchange ideas and aware of their own fallibility (2). These traits could serve as a preventative measure for research misconduct and other, various practices that are detrimental to science. | ||
|Important For=phd students | |Important For=phd students | ||
+ | |Has Best Practice=All European Academies (ALLEA) published a revised and updated European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECoC), in which it emphasized the importance of addressing ethics and research integrity. The ECoC defines principles and practices of good research, and includes the virtues of reliability, honesty, respect and accountability. Usually philosophers consider honesty and the following characteristics to be epistemic virtues: attentiveness, benevolence (principle of charity), creativity, curiosity, discernment, humility, objectivity, parsimony, studiousness, understanding, warranty, and wisdom (3). | ||
+ | |Has Detail=1. Steup M, Zalta EN. Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2018 Edition. Accessed May 24 2019. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/epistemology/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Turri J, Alfano M, Greco J. Virtue Epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition. Accessed May 24 2019. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/epistemology-virtue/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Pigliucci M. The Virtuous Skeptic. Skeptical Inquirer. 2017;41 (2): 54–57. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Contributor: Ruzica Tokalic | ||
|Has Reference=a | |Has Reference=a | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
− | {{Tags}} | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:520b3bc7-a6ab-4617-95f2-89c9dee31c53 |
+ | |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Tags | ||
+ | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
+ | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Moral reasoning; Responsible research | ||
+ | }} |
Revision as of 11:07, 13 February 2020
Epistemic virtues
What is this about?
Why is this important?
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
In Detail
1. Steup M, Zalta EN. Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2018 Edition. Accessed May 24 2019. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/epistemology/
2. Turri J, Alfano M, Greco J. Virtue Epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition. Accessed May 24 2019. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/epistemology-virtue/
3. Pigliucci M. The Virtuous Skeptic. Skeptical Inquirer. 2017;41 (2): 54–57.
Contributor: Ruzica TokalicThe Embassy Editorial team, Ružica Tokalić, Iris Lechner contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 21, 2020