Difference between revisions of "Theme:0d054575-ca21-4209-b7c5-6120fc0ed647"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theme | {{Theme | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
| + | |Has Parent Theme=Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9 | ||
|Title=Informed consent | |Title=Informed consent | ||
|Is About=Informed consent is a process of acquiring permission from potential participants, before conducting some sort of medical intervention, collection of personal data or enrollment in a study.<ref>Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):993-7.</ref> | |Is About=Informed consent is a process of acquiring permission from potential participants, before conducting some sort of medical intervention, collection of personal data or enrollment in a study.<ref>Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):993-7.</ref> | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
|Important Because=In order to maintain high standards of research ethics, personal dignity and autonomy must be respected. To achieve this, before conducting research, researchers have to seek informed consent from participants. | |Important Because=In order to maintain high standards of research ethics, personal dignity and autonomy must be respected. To achieve this, before conducting research, researchers have to seek informed consent from participants. | ||
|Important For=Junior researchers; Research subjects; Senior researchers; PhD students; Early career researchers | |Important For=Junior researchers; Research subjects; Senior researchers; PhD students; Early career researchers | ||
| − | |Has Best Practice=The idea of written informed consent is not new. It first appeared in the early 20<sup>th</sup> century in Walter Reed’s research of yellow fever.<ref>Cutter L. Walter Reed, Yellow Fever, and Informed Consent. Mil Med. 2016;181(1):90-1.</ref> The development of human rights after the second World War brought to life numerous declarations and rules regarding human experimentation.<ref>Merz JF. The Nuremberg Code and Informed Consent for Research: JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):85-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17704.</ref> | + | |Has Best Practice=The idea of written informed consent is not new. It first appeared in the early 20<sup>th</sup> century in Walter Reed’s research of yellow fever.<ref>Cutter L. Walter Reed, Yellow Fever, and Informed Consent. Mil Med. 2016;181(1):90-1.</ref> The development of human rights after the second World War brought to life numerous declarations and rules (e.g., the Nuremberg Code) regarding human experimentation.<ref>Merz JF. The Nuremberg Code and Informed Consent for Research: JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):85-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17704.</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | In order for informed consent to be valid, four conditions need to be met<ref>Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). ''Principles of Biomedical Ethics''. Oxford University Press.</ref>: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Voluntariness: subjects should not be coerced. This could be a tricky condition sometimes, especially when subjects have no alternative choice (e.g., when a terminally ill patient is offered to join an experiment that might save their life) | ||
| + | *Capacity: subjects should have the capacity to understand and judge provided information. This could become a thorny issue when dealin with vulnerable subjects (e.g., children) or patients with mental problems (e.g., those suffering from illnesses such as dimensia) | ||
| + | *Information: subjects should be provided with adequate amount of information. These may include methodology, process, duration of the experiment, but also research goals, beneficiaries, data retention schedule, others uses of extracted data (e.g., publication of research articles, use of material in tangent projects, etc.). | ||
| + | *Comprehension: subjects should understand the provided information. Relevant considerations include using straightforward language that is understandable for the least advantaged members of the target group, and avoding the use of scientific jargon. | ||
Before accepting a manuscript for publication, editors should make sure authors have all the necessary research ethics permissions and signed informed consent forms from all participants. | Before accepting a manuscript for publication, editors should make sure authors have all the necessary research ethics permissions and signed informed consent forms from all participants. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 25: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Informed consent; Vulnerable and non-competent subjects | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Informed consent; Vulnerable and non-competent subjects | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:50, 25 March 2021
ThemesInformed consent
What is this about?
Informed consent is a process of acquiring permission from potential participants, before conducting some sort of medical intervention, collection of personal data or enrollment in a study.[1]
- ↑ Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):993-7.
Why is this important?
In order to maintain high standards of research ethics, personal dignity and autonomy must be respected. To achieve this, before conducting research, researchers have to seek informed consent from participants.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
The idea of written informed consent is not new. It first appeared in the early 20th century in Walter Reed’s research of yellow fever.[1] The development of human rights after the second World War brought to life numerous declarations and rules (e.g., the Nuremberg Code) regarding human experimentation.[2]
In order for informed consent to be valid, four conditions need to be met[3]:
- Voluntariness: subjects should not be coerced. This could be a tricky condition sometimes, especially when subjects have no alternative choice (e.g., when a terminally ill patient is offered to join an experiment that might save their life)
- Capacity: subjects should have the capacity to understand and judge provided information. This could become a thorny issue when dealin with vulnerable subjects (e.g., children) or patients with mental problems (e.g., those suffering from illnesses such as dimensia)
- Information: subjects should be provided with adequate amount of information. These may include methodology, process, duration of the experiment, but also research goals, beneficiaries, data retention schedule, others uses of extracted data (e.g., publication of research articles, use of material in tangent projects, etc.).
- Comprehension: subjects should understand the provided information. Relevant considerations include using straightforward language that is understandable for the least advantaged members of the target group, and avoding the use of scientific jargon.
Before accepting a manuscript for publication, editors should make sure authors have all the necessary research ethics permissions and signed informed consent forms from all participants.
- ↑ Cutter L. Walter Reed, Yellow Fever, and Informed Consent. Mil Med. 2016;181(1):90-1.
- ↑ Merz JF. The Nuremberg Code and Informed Consent for Research: JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):85-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17704.
- ↑ Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner, Mohammad Hosseini, Ružica Tokalić contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Mar 25, 2021
