Difference between revisions of "Theme:06925397-5843-495d-a22d-3e983bdcb99e"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(mobo import migrateAll) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theme | {{Theme | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
| + | |Has Parent Theme=Theme:4596ffa1-88cd-40bc-b346-a58837206404 | ||
|Title=Open access publishing: the new norm? | |Title=Open access publishing: the new norm? | ||
| − | |Is About=Open access publishing allows research outputs, such as academic journal articles, to be distributed online without barriers. This is in contrast to traditional non-open access publishing, where access has to be acquired through subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges. Although developments in the open access movement suggest its popularity is rising, there is little information about the impact on publishing | + | |Is About=Open access publishing allows research outputs, such as academic journal articles, to be distributed online without barriers. This is in contrast to traditional non-open access publishing, where access has to be acquired through subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges. Although developments in the open access movement suggest its popularity is rising, there is little information about the impact on publishing. |
| − | |Important Because=Whether access to scientific literature should be open or behind paywalls is a prominent topic of debate in the research community. In a 2018 analysis on open access publishing, it was estimated that 28% of all current journal articles are freely available online | + | |Important Because=Whether access to scientific literature should be open or behind paywalls is a prominent topic of debate in the research community. In a 2018 analysis on open access publishing, it was estimated that 28% of all current journal articles are freely available online. <ref>Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 2018;6:e4375.</ref>This proportion has been growing over the last 20 years. In 2015, the most recent year that was examined, 45% of all articles were reported to be open access .<ref>Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 2018;6:e4375.</ref> The adoption of open access practices however differs between publishers and research fields. |
| − | |Important For=phd students | + | <references /> |
| + | |Important For=phd students; funders | ||
| + | |Has Best Practice=There are different ways to make research open access. The two main routes that authors can take towards publishing open access are self-archiving, the so-called green route, and open access publishing, the gold route. <ref>Springer. What is Open Access? Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/open-access/what-is-open-access/10286522. Accessed 29 May, 2019</ref> When taking the green route, the article is published behind a paywall, but a free copy is published in an online repository. In the gold route, articles are published immediately in open access mode. | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Has Reference=a | |Has Reference=a | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| − | {{Tags}} | + | |Related To Resource=Resource:67faeb3a-593c-473e-899d-4fb29abaa1b9;Resource:47bfd883-c518-4a97-98fb-86b5cf442d3e;Resource:5aefe751-0a20-4597-98a5-a59bf06a987a;Resource:A0df9be7-401a-43ba-af41-245019119182 |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:Bbf561cd-7369-4314-ac74-2c870373af9d;Theme:F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Virtue And Value=Transparency | ||
| + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Open access; Publication ethics | ||
| + | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:55, 25 March 2021
ThemesOpen access publishing: the new norm?
What is this about?
Open access publishing allows research outputs, such as academic journal articles, to be distributed online without barriers. This is in contrast to traditional non-open access publishing, where access has to be acquired through subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges. Although developments in the open access movement suggest its popularity is rising, there is little information about the impact on publishing.
Why is this important?
Whether access to scientific literature should be open or behind paywalls is a prominent topic of debate in the research community. In a 2018 analysis on open access publishing, it was estimated that 28% of all current journal articles are freely available online. [1]This proportion has been growing over the last 20 years. In 2015, the most recent year that was examined, 45% of all articles were reported to be open access .[2] The adoption of open access practices however differs between publishers and research fields.
- ↑ Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 2018;6:e4375.
- ↑ Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 2018;6:e4375.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
There are different ways to make research open access. The two main routes that authors can take towards publishing open access are self-archiving, the so-called green route, and open access publishing, the gold route. [1] When taking the green route, the article is published behind a paywall, but a free copy is published in an online repository. In the gold route, articles are published immediately in open access mode.
- ↑ Springer. What is Open Access? Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/open-access/what-is-open-access/10286522. Accessed 29 May, 2019
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner, Elsa Amin, Lars Lambriks contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Mar 25, 2021
