Difference between revisions of "Theme:2040cd9d-877c-48de-b430-3d9761aa1e25"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Theme Type=Good Practices
 
|Theme Type=Good Practices
 
|Title=Reasonable standards for career advancement
 
|Title=Reasonable standards for career advancement
 +
|Is About=The Singapore statement specifies that “Research institutions should create and sustain environments that encourage integrity through education, clear policies, and reasonable standards for advancement, while fostering work environments that support research integrity.” (Responsibility #13)
 
|Important Because=If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution, and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct.
 
|Important Because=If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution, and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct.
 
|Important For=phd students; Researchers; Postdocs; Universities
 
|Important For=phd students; Researchers; Postdocs; Universities
|Has Reference=a
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To}}
 
{{Related To}}
 
{{Tags}}
 
{{Tags}}

Revision as of 20:36, 9 March 2020

Reasonable standards for career advancement

What is this about?

The Singapore statement specifies that “Research institutions should create and sustain environments that encourage integrity through education, clear policies, and reasonable standards for advancement, while fostering work environments that support research integrity.” (Responsibility #13)

Why is this important?

If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution, and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6