Difference between revisions of "Theme:06925397-5843-495d-a22d-3e983bdcb99e"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Theme
 
{{Theme
 
|Theme Type=Good Practices
 
|Theme Type=Good Practices
 +
|Has Parent Theme=Theme:F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3
 
|Title=Open access publishing: the new norm?
 
|Title=Open access publishing: the new norm?
 
|Is About=Open access publishing allows research outputs, such as academic journal articles, to be distributed online without barriers. This is in contrast to traditional non-open access publishing, where access has to be acquired through subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges. Although developments in the open access movement suggest its popularity is rising, there is little information about the impact on publishing
 
|Is About=Open access publishing allows research outputs, such as academic journal articles, to be distributed online without barriers. This is in contrast to traditional non-open access publishing, where access has to be acquired through subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges. Although developments in the open access movement suggest its popularity is rising, there is little information about the impact on publishing

Revision as of 15:24, 3 June 2020

Open access publishing: the new norm?

What is this about?

Open access publishing allows research outputs, such as academic journal articles, to be distributed online without barriers. This is in contrast to traditional non-open access publishing, where access has to be acquired through subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges. Although developments in the open access movement suggest its popularity is rising, there is little information about the impact on publishing

Why is this important?

Whether access to scientific literature should be open or behind paywalls is a prominent topic of debate in the research community. In a 2018 analysis on open access publishing, it was estimated that 28% of all current journal articles are freely available online. [1] This proportion has been growing over the last 20 years. In 2015, the most recent year that was examined, 45% of all articles were reported to be open access . [2]The adoption of open access practices however differs between publishers and research fields

  1. Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 2018;6:e4375.
  2. Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 2018;6:e4375.

For whom is this important?

What are the best practices?

There are different ways to make research open access. The two main routes that authors can take towards publishing open access are self-archiving, the so-called green route, and open access publishing, the gold route. [1] When taking the green route, the article is published behind a paywall, but a free copy is published in an online repository. In the gold route, articles are published immediately in open access mode

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6