Difference between revisions of "Theme:72c8ab8d-bbf8-4503-8b48-9de7eac37673"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Important Because=A lot of scientific work happens through collaboration. Yet, collaborations can also lead to conflict when there is lack of clarity about the roles of different collaborators, or when expectations are not met. | |Important Because=A lot of scientific work happens through collaboration. Yet, collaborations can also lead to conflict when there is lack of clarity about the roles of different collaborators, or when expectations are not met. | ||
− | Collaborative work has become more important over the past few decades, partially due to the rise of interdisciplinary research. The number of co-authors on a paper is a potential indifcatar for the rise of collaborations | + | Collaborative work has become more important over the past few decades, partially due to the rise of interdisciplinary research. The number of co-authors on a paper is a potential indifcatar for the rise of collaborations, with the average number of co-authors on research papers for the PNAS rose from 3.9 in 1981 to 8.4 in 2001. <ref>Vicens, Quentin, and Philip E. Bourne. 2007. “Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration.” PLOS Computational Biology 3 (3): e44</ref> |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important For=Researchers; PhD students | |Important For=Researchers; PhD students | ||
|Has Best Practice=The European Code of Conduct<ref>European Science Foundation, All European Academies. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. 2017.</ref> states that good research practice with regard to collaborations are based on the following principles: | |Has Best Practice=The European Code of Conduct<ref>European Science Foundation, All European Academies. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. 2017.</ref> states that good research practice with regard to collaborations are based on the following principles: | ||
− | * "All partners in research collaborations take responsibility for the integrity of the research. | + | *"All partners in research collaborations take responsibility for the integrity of the research. |
− | * All partners in research collaborations agree at the outset on the goals of the research and on the process for communicating their research as transparently and openly as possible. | + | *All partners in research collaborations agree at the outset on the goals of the research and on the process for communicating their research as transparently and openly as possible. |
− | * All partners formally agree at the start of their collaboration on expectations and standards concerning research integrity, on the laws and regulations that will apply, on protection of the intellectual property of collaborators, and on procedures for handling conflicts and possible cases of misconduct. | + | * All partners formally agree at the start of their collaboration on expectations and standards concerning research integrity, on the laws and regulations that will apply, on protection of the intellectual property of collaborators, and on procedures for handling conflicts and possible cases of misconduct. |
− | * All partners in research collaborations are properly informed and consulted about submissions for publication of the research results. "(ECC 2017, section 2.6) | + | *All partners in research collaborations are properly informed and consulted about submissions for publication of the research results. "(ECC 2017, section 2.6) |
Vicens and Bourne (2007) suggest the following rules<ref>Vicens, Quentin, and Philip E. Bourne. 2007. “Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration.” PLOS Computational Biology 3 (3): e44 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030044.</ref>: | Vicens and Bourne (2007) suggest the following rules<ref>Vicens, Quentin, and Philip E. Bourne. 2007. “Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration.” PLOS Computational Biology 3 (3): e44 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030044.</ref>: | ||
− | # Do Not Be Lured into Just Any Collaboration | + | #Do Not Be Lured into Just Any Collaboration |
− | # Decide at the Beginning Who Will Work on What Tasks | + | #Decide at the Beginning Who Will Work on What Tasks |
− | # Stick to Your Tasks | + | #Stick to Your Tasks |
− | # Be Open and Honest | + | #Be Open and Honest |
− | # Feel Respect, Get Respect | + | #Feel Respect, Get Respect |
− | # Communicate, Communicate, and Communicate | + | #Communicate, Communicate, and Communicate |
− | # Protect Yourself from a Collaboration That Turns Sour | + | #Protect Yourself from a Collaboration That Turns Sour |
− | # Always Acknowledge and Cite Your Collaborators | + | #Always Acknowledge and Cite Your Collaborators |
− | # Seek Advice from Experienced Scientists | + | #Seek Advice from Experienced Scientists |
− | # If Your Collaboration Satisfies You, Keep It Going | + | #If Your Collaboration Satisfies You, Keep It Going |
+ | <references /> | ||
|Has Reference=a | |Has Reference=a | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 14:24, 12 October 2020
Collaborative working
What is this about?
Collaborative working is "the act of two or more people or organizations working together for a particular purpose". [1] Collaborative working can cover formal or informal ways to work together. Formal collaborations include research projects under specified research grants, informal collaborations include, for example, networks or alliances.[2] Collaborations can be permanent or last for a certain time period. Important for succesfull research collaborations is having good underlying principles providing the basis for agreements of collaborations.
Why is this important?
A lot of scientific work happens through collaboration. Yet, collaborations can also lead to conflict when there is lack of clarity about the roles of different collaborators, or when expectations are not met.
Collaborative work has become more important over the past few decades, partially due to the rise of interdisciplinary research. The number of co-authors on a paper is a potential indifcatar for the rise of collaborations, with the average number of co-authors on research papers for the PNAS rose from 3.9 in 1981 to 8.4 in 2001. [1]
- ↑ Vicens, Quentin, and Philip E. Bourne. 2007. “Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration.” PLOS Computational Biology 3 (3): e44
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
The European Code of Conduct[1] states that good research practice with regard to collaborations are based on the following principles:
- "All partners in research collaborations take responsibility for the integrity of the research.
- All partners in research collaborations agree at the outset on the goals of the research and on the process for communicating their research as transparently and openly as possible.
- All partners formally agree at the start of their collaboration on expectations and standards concerning research integrity, on the laws and regulations that will apply, on protection of the intellectual property of collaborators, and on procedures for handling conflicts and possible cases of misconduct.
- All partners in research collaborations are properly informed and consulted about submissions for publication of the research results. "(ECC 2017, section 2.6)
Vicens and Bourne (2007) suggest the following rules[2]:
- Do Not Be Lured into Just Any Collaboration
- Decide at the Beginning Who Will Work on What Tasks
- Stick to Your Tasks
- Be Open and Honest
- Feel Respect, Get Respect
- Communicate, Communicate, and Communicate
- Protect Yourself from a Collaboration That Turns Sour
- Always Acknowledge and Cite Your Collaborators
- Seek Advice from Experienced Scientists
- If Your Collaboration Satisfies You, Keep It Going
- ↑ European Science Foundation, All European Academies. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. 2017.
- ↑ Vicens, Quentin, and Philip E. Bourne. 2007. “Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration.” PLOS Computational Biology 3 (3): e44 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030044.
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 12, 2020