Difference between revisions of "Theme:2040cd9d-877c-48de-b430-3d9761aa1e25"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(mobo import migrateAll) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
|Title=Reasonable standards for career advancement | |Title=Reasonable standards for career advancement | ||
| − | |||
|Important Because=If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution, and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct. | |Important Because=If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution, and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct. | ||
| − | |Important For=phd students | + | |Important For=phd students; Researchers; Postdocs; Universities |
|Has Reference=a | |Has Reference=a | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags}} | {{Tags}} | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 9 March 2020
ThemesReasonable standards for career advancement
Why is this important?
If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution, and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct.
For whom is this important?
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner, Fenneke Blom, Hugh Desmond contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Apr 22, 2021
