Difference between revisions of "Theme:6f515a18-ce5f-42b0-8741-27248f6435a0"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(mobo import migrateAll) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
|Title=Science policy | |Title=Science policy | ||
− | |Is About=Science policy influences the very basics of all science because it determines the funding and goals of the scientific community, through investments both in people and equipment. Science policies are usually created by governmental bodies and/or other stakeholders which have a financial interest in science | + | |Is About=Science policy influences the very basics of all science because it determines the funding and goals of the scientific community, through investments both in people and equipment. Science policies are usually created by governmental bodies and/or other stakeholders which have a financial interest in science . <ref>Douglas HE. Science, policy and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburg Press, 2009. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wrc78.</ref> |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=Science policies address areas such as basic research, development of new technologies, and facilitation in bringing technologies to the market. They steer science into areas of importance and interest to society. Policies are determined by sets of values or priorities that policy makers have. In an ideal world. policy makers should address the greatest needs of the community through the application of science policies, however the world of politics is far from an ideal one. | |Important Because=Science policies address areas such as basic research, development of new technologies, and facilitation in bringing technologies to the market. They steer science into areas of importance and interest to society. Policies are determined by sets of values or priorities that policy makers have. In an ideal world. policy makers should address the greatest needs of the community through the application of science policies, however the world of politics is far from an ideal one. | ||
− | |Important For=phd students | + | |Important For=phd students; Scientists; Ethics committee members; Researchers; academic staff; Research institutions; Policy makers; Postdocs; Universities; Junior researchers; Senior researchers |
+ | |Has Best Practice=Four types of scientific polices are described. The first one invests in basic research, hoping that some kind of breakthrough will result in a vast array of new technologies which will then be commercialized and pay back the investments. The second one is focused on technology development, in which engineering is supported more than basic science. The most extreme examples of such science policies are the Manhattan project and the Space projects pursued by the US and the Soviet Union in the second half of the 20th century. <ref>Goldwhite H. The Manhattan Project. J Fluorine Chem. 1986;33(1):139-132.</ref> Utilitarian scientific policy gives social content to these two policies. In the utilitarian policy approach, the aim is to prioritize scientific projects that significantly reduce suffering or improve quality of life for larger numbers of people. In contrast to the utilitarian approach, the monumental approach favors research just for the sake of greater understanding of the universe. In reality, scientific policies are often a mixture of these four types. | ||
|Has Reference=- | |Has Reference=- | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 17:02, 11 March 2020
Themes
Science policy
What is this about?
Science policy influences the very basics of all science because it determines the funding and goals of the scientific community, through investments both in people and equipment. Science policies are usually created by governmental bodies and/or other stakeholders which have a financial interest in science . [1]
- ↑ Douglas HE. Science, policy and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburg Press, 2009. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wrc78.
Why is this important?
Science policies address areas such as basic research, development of new technologies, and facilitation in bringing technologies to the market. They steer science into areas of importance and interest to society. Policies are determined by sets of values or priorities that policy makers have. In an ideal world. policy makers should address the greatest needs of the community through the application of science policies, however the world of politics is far from an ideal one.
For whom is this important?
phd studentsScientistsEthics committee membersResearchersacademic staffResearch institutionsPolicy makersPostdocsUniversitiesJunior researchersSenior researchers
What are the best practices?
Four types of scientific polices are described. The first one invests in basic research, hoping that some kind of breakthrough will result in a vast array of new technologies which will then be commercialized and pay back the investments. The second one is focused on technology development, in which engineering is supported more than basic science. The most extreme examples of such science policies are the Manhattan project and the Space projects pursued by the US and the Soviet Union in the second half of the 20th century. [1] Utilitarian scientific policy gives social content to these two policies. In the utilitarian policy approach, the aim is to prioritize scientific projects that significantly reduce suffering or improve quality of life for larger numbers of people. In contrast to the utilitarian approach, the monumental approach favors research just for the sake of greater understanding of the universe. In reality, scientific policies are often a mixture of these four types.
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner, Mohammad Hosseini, Andrijana Perković Paloš, Benjamin Benzon contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 22, 2021
Other information
When
Where
- ↑ Goldwhite H. The Manhattan Project. J Fluorine Chem. 1986;33(1):139-132.