Revision as of 12:13, 22 May 2020

Themes

Altmetrics

What is this about?

Altmetrics is an alternative, online based approach to research metrics, as opposed to traditional ones, such as h-index or impact factor. ^[1]

↑ Chavda J, Patel A. Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(642).

Why is this important?

Ever since its invention, the Internet has become an omnipresent part of everyday communication. It has become common in science to share your articles via Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook. Measuring that part of online impact is important as it offers different insight into popularity and use of published articles .^[1]

↑ Warren HR, Raison N, Dasgupta P. The Rise of Altmetrics. Jama. 2017;317(2):131-2.

For whom is this important?

PhD studentsScientistsAll stakeholders in researchSupervisorsPostdocsResearch performing organisationsResearch funding organisationsJournalsEditorsJunior researchersSenior researchers

What are the best practices?

There are different online companies offering altmetrics services. Some of them are Altmetric, Impactstory, and Plum Analytics .^[1] They can track HTML views and PDF downloads, shared articles on social media platforms, saved and cited items. Altmetrics scores are often indicators of how popular an article is online, with the general public. Unlike typical research metrics, Altmetrics software enables the user to track the dissemination of publications in real time. Some publishers have started offering their readers this information (BioMed Central, PLOS, Nature, Elsevier). Some argue that this form of metric is not a good indicator of popularity or quality, as social media activity and time of publication can have a big influence on the metric. ^[2] There seems to be no correlations between citations and altmetrics.

↑ Piwowar H. Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature. 2013;493(7431).
↑ Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4).

The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner, Natalie Evans, Vassilis Markakis, Marin Vidak contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Mar 26, 2021

Other information

Virtues & Values

Good Practices & Misconduct

[1] Chavda J, Patel A. Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(642).

[2] Warren HR, Raison N, Dasgupta P. The Rise of Altmetrics. Jama. 2017;317(2):131-2.

[3] Piwowar H. Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature. 2013;493(7431).

[4] Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4).

[1]

[1]

[1]

[2]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Theme
 |Theme Type=Good Practices
+|Has Parent Theme=Theme:B84659ea-3fc8-4c93-86cf-6aa4db253ad4
 |Title=Altmetrics
 |Is About=Altmetrics is an alternative, online based approach to research metrics, as opposed to traditional ones, such as h-index or impact factor. <ref>Chavda J, Patel A. Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(642).</ref>
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 }}
 {{Related To
-|Related To Theme=Theme:8453f98b-244e-4147-9268-504afbe9d878
+|Related To Theme=Theme:8453f98b-244e-4147-9268-504afbe9d878;Theme:B84659ea-3fc8-4c93-86cf-6aa4db253ad4
 }}
 {{Tags
 |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Accountability
-|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Institutional responsibilities; Funders’ responsibilities; Publication ethics; Grant applications; Science policy; Perverse incentives
+|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Institutional responsibilities; Funders’ responsibilities; Publication ethics; Grant applications; Science policy; Perverse incentives; Altmetrics
 }}

Difference between revisions of "Theme:B84659ea-3fc8-4c93-86cf-6aa4db253ad4"