Difference between revisions of "Theme:63f356f9-aa1d-4405-9f1d-c27ec593df7b"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Has Parent Theme=Theme:639528ea-d2c2-4565-8b44-15bb9646f74b | |Has Parent Theme=Theme:639528ea-d2c2-4565-8b44-15bb9646f74b | ||
|Title=Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity | |Title=Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity | ||
| − | |Is About=The | + | |Is About=The National Survey on Research Integrity (NSRI) is the first-ever nation-wide online survey targeting researchers of all universities and university medical centres in The Netherlands. NSRI aims to report on factors that promote or hinder Responsible Research Practices (RRPs). These factors cover for instance perceptions of organizational justice, scientific norms, work pressure, mentoring, and social support. It is possible that these factors play different roles in different disciplinary fields: biomedical, natural and engineering sciences, social sciences, and the humanities. Similarly, the importance of the factors may vary over the career stages of a researcher. The NSRI is designed to be large enough to look separately at subgroups. |
The survey will also report on the prevalence of RRPs, Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) and research misconduct (defined as falsification and fabrication) in each of the four disciplinary fields and across three academic ranks. Because of its unique [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvcaziHteAI methodology] and its nationwide target of approximately 40,000 researchers across all disciplinary fields, NSRI can provide solid data to identify driving factors that promote or hinder RRP. | The survey will also report on the prevalence of RRPs, Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) and research misconduct (defined as falsification and fabrication) in each of the four disciplinary fields and across three academic ranks. Because of its unique [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvcaziHteAI methodology] and its nationwide target of approximately 40,000 researchers across all disciplinary fields, NSRI can provide solid data to identify driving factors that promote or hinder RRP. | ||
| − | |Important Because=Many researchers work in environments that stimulate responsible behavior. However, scholarly environments are also complex and full of competition. Competition can stimulate people to work hard, but may also have downsides. What | + | |Important Because=Many researchers work in environments that stimulate responsible behavior. However, scholarly environments are also complex and full of competition. Competition can stimulate people to work hard, but may also have downsides. What is an optimal research environment? What working conditions are detrimental to good research practices? Fostering responsible research and preventing questionable practices is important. However, the causes behind the variability in engagement in responsible and questionable practices and research misconduct are largely unknown. Once known, strategies to enhance responsible research practices while reducing questionable practices can be developed and evaluated. The NSRI attempts to play an important role in solving this. Watch this two-minute [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYvsa-1d_wQ video] on why research integrity matters to every one of us in society. |
To optimally address all 40,000 academic researchers in The Netherlands, a survey instrument was the most fitting choice for this project. While it has its drawbacks, especially when studying a complex topic such as research integrity, the primary goal of this survey was to get concrete estimates of RRP, QRPs, and their associated factors for these practices across disciplines. Balancing time to answer such a survey, while protecting the privacy and the target sample size of about 40,000 researchers, a survey tool was most appropriate. | To optimally address all 40,000 academic researchers in The Netherlands, a survey instrument was the most fitting choice for this project. While it has its drawbacks, especially when studying a complex topic such as research integrity, the primary goal of this survey was to get concrete estimates of RRP, QRPs, and their associated factors for these practices across disciplines. Balancing time to answer such a survey, while protecting the privacy and the target sample size of about 40,000 researchers, a survey tool was most appropriate. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* It aims to provide valid disciplinary field-specific estimates on the occurrence of responsible research practices and questionable research practices across the biomedical sciences, the humanities, natural sciences and engineering, and the social and behavioral sciences. | * It aims to provide valid disciplinary field-specific estimates on the occurrence of responsible research practices and questionable research practices across the biomedical sciences, the humanities, natural sciences and engineering, and the social and behavioral sciences. | ||
| − | *It targets the entire population of academic researchers in The Netherlands | + | *It targets the entire population of academic researchers in The Netherlands. |
| − | *The survey | + | *The survey employs a technique known as the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvcaziHteAI Randomized Response (RR)] which has shown to elicit more honest answers around sensitive topics. |
| − | * It | + | * It examines a broad range of factors that may impact scholars engagement in responsible research practices and questionable research practices. |
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Given the sensitivity of the topic, NSRI has paid very close attention to fully ensuring the protection of the identity of the participants and their research institutions. Our privacy protection measures include: | Given the sensitivity of the topic, NSRI has paid very close attention to fully ensuring the protection of the identity of the participants and their research institutions. Our privacy protection measures include: | ||
| − | #No personal identifying data except disciplinary field and | + | #No personal identifying data except disciplinary field and academic rank (PhD, A/Prof, Full Prof) were collected in the survey |
| − | #The use of the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvcaziHteAI&feature=emb_logo Randomized | + | #The use of the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvcaziHteAI&feature=emb_logo Randomized Response] (RR) technique for the two most sensitive questions. RR which has been proven in research on doping and social security fraud to reduce the effect of social desirability and thereby elicit a greater sense of trust with respondents. It does so by creating a probabilistic rather than direct association between the answers of respondents and the sensitive question (see also [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124104268664 Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research- Thirty-Five Years of Validation. Sociological Methods & Research 2005; 33 (3): 319-348)] |
| − | #All data was collected by a trusted third party, [https://www.kantar.com/public/ Kantar Public] so the research team never directly | + | #All data was collected by a trusted third party, [https://www.kantar.com/public/ Kantar Public] so the research team never directly received any personal data. |
| − | #IP addresses were not collected. The research team only | + | #IP addresses were not collected. The research team only received anonymized data by disciplinary field and academic rank. |
Because of these measures, no data was analysed or published that can be traced to individual participants or specific research institutions. | Because of these measures, no data was analysed or published that can be traced to individual participants or specific research institutions. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
To find out more about the NSRI, visit our FAQ page [https://community.embassy.science/t/nsri-faqs/358 here]. | To find out more about the NSRI, visit our FAQ page [https://community.embassy.science/t/nsri-faqs/358 here]. | ||
| − | |Important For=PhD students; Postdocs; Senior researchers; Early career researchers; Universities | + | |Important For=PhD students; Postdocs; Senior researchers; Early career researchers; Universities; Research funding organisations |
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 29 November 2022
ThemesDutch National Survey on Research Integrity
What is this about?
The National Survey on Research Integrity (NSRI) is the first-ever nation-wide online survey targeting researchers of all universities and university medical centres in The Netherlands. NSRI aims to report on factors that promote or hinder Responsible Research Practices (RRPs). These factors cover for instance perceptions of organizational justice, scientific norms, work pressure, mentoring, and social support. It is possible that these factors play different roles in different disciplinary fields: biomedical, natural and engineering sciences, social sciences, and the humanities. Similarly, the importance of the factors may vary over the career stages of a researcher. The NSRI is designed to be large enough to look separately at subgroups.
The survey will also report on the prevalence of RRPs, Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) and research misconduct (defined as falsification and fabrication) in each of the four disciplinary fields and across three academic ranks. Because of its unique methodology and its nationwide target of approximately 40,000 researchers across all disciplinary fields, NSRI can provide solid data to identify driving factors that promote or hinder RRP.Why is this important?
Many researchers work in environments that stimulate responsible behavior. However, scholarly environments are also complex and full of competition. Competition can stimulate people to work hard, but may also have downsides. What is an optimal research environment? What working conditions are detrimental to good research practices? Fostering responsible research and preventing questionable practices is important. However, the causes behind the variability in engagement in responsible and questionable practices and research misconduct are largely unknown. Once known, strategies to enhance responsible research practices while reducing questionable practices can be developed and evaluated. The NSRI attempts to play an important role in solving this. Watch this two-minute video on why research integrity matters to every one of us in society.
To optimally address all 40,000 academic researchers in The Netherlands, a survey instrument was the most fitting choice for this project. While it has its drawbacks, especially when studying a complex topic such as research integrity, the primary goal of this survey was to get concrete estimates of RRP, QRPs, and their associated factors for these practices across disciplines. Balancing time to answer such a survey, while protecting the privacy and the target sample size of about 40,000 researchers, a survey tool was most appropriate.
This does not exclude us from exploring themes that will arise from the survey results through more detailed focus group discussions at the next stage of this project.
The Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity (NSRI) is unique in a number of ways:
- It aims to provide valid disciplinary field-specific estimates on the occurrence of responsible research practices and questionable research practices across the biomedical sciences, the humanities, natural sciences and engineering, and the social and behavioral sciences.
- It targets the entire population of academic researchers in The Netherlands.
- The survey employs a technique known as the Randomized Response (RR) which has shown to elicit more honest answers around sensitive topics.
- It examines a broad range of factors that may impact scholars engagement in responsible research practices and questionable research practices.
How is the privacy of participants joining the NSRI guaranteed?
Given the sensitivity of the topic, NSRI has paid very close attention to fully ensuring the protection of the identity of the participants and their research institutions. Our privacy protection measures include:
- No personal identifying data except disciplinary field and academic rank (PhD, A/Prof, Full Prof) were collected in the survey
- The use of the Randomized Response (RR) technique for the two most sensitive questions. RR which has been proven in research on doping and social security fraud to reduce the effect of social desirability and thereby elicit a greater sense of trust with respondents. It does so by creating a probabilistic rather than direct association between the answers of respondents and the sensitive question (see also Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research- Thirty-Five Years of Validation. Sociological Methods & Research 2005; 33 (3): 319-348)
- All data was collected by a trusted third party, Kantar Public so the research team never directly received any personal data.
- IP addresses were not collected. The research team only received anonymized data by disciplinary field and academic rank.
Because of these measures, no data was analysed or published that can be traced to individual participants or specific research institutions.
You can access the NSRI’s publications here.
To find out more about the NSRI, visit our FAQ page here.For whom is this important?
PhD studentsPostdocsSenior researchersEarly career researchersUniversitiesResearch funding organisations
Iris Lechner, Natalie Evans, Andrijana Perković Paloš, Claudia Pallise Perello contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Nov 29, 2022
