Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection

Themes

Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection

What is this about?

Numerous ‘misbehaviours’ are associated with the data collection phase of research, from the intentional misconducts of falsification and fabrication, to lesser but more frequent ‘sloppy’ research practices such as poor note taking or inadequate data storage.

Why is this important?

The importance of the data collection phase cannot be overemphasized. For research results to be trustworthy, the underlying data needs to be of a high quality. ‘Questionable’ practices related to data collection identifiedby research integrity experts include:

1.      Collect more data after noticing that the results are almost statistically significant  [unless specified in a predefined adequate plan for interim analysis –  also called ‘peeking’]   

2.      Fabricate data   

3.      Stop data collection earlier than planned because the results are already statistically significant  [unless predefined stopping rules are implemented appropriately ‐ also called ‘peeking’]

4.      Not adhere to pertinent laws and regulations  [including the laws and regulations for human and animal studies, safety regulations, good clinical  practice, good laboratory practice etc.]   

5.      Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials  [including archiving for an appropriate period]   

6.      Keep inadequate notes of the research process  [with (digital) lab journals or its equivalent in other types of research]   

7.      Ignore basic principles of quality assurance (From Bouter et al 2016).

For whom is this important?

Early career researchersJunior researchersResearchersSenior researchersScientists

Natalie Evans contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Jul 13, 2021

Other information