Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities (2019)
- Contemporary Science, Values and Animal Subjects in Research
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people.
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs
- Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2017
- Honest refereeing
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts
- Albanian Regulation on Ethics in Research and Publishing ( 2012)
- Dual submissions
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk
- Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Data (2016), Research Council of Lithuania
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance
- Institutional Publishing Service Providers Guidelines
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- Research and scientific integrity policy (2018), National Research Council Canada
- European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct
- Resource:22290809-0b2e-47d3-9824-06b5aa3fb95e
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically
- CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTISTS (2017)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review
- Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses
- Research Data Management
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
- Research Ethics and integrity for the GREEN transition (Policy brief), 2025
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation
- Ley 26.899, Repositorios digitales institucionales de acceso abierto. (2013), Argentine National Congress
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements
