Long pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct [732 bytes]
- (hist) Developing Informed Research Participants in an Introductory Psychology Participant Pool [731 bytes]
- (hist) Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC [731 bytes]
- (hist) A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics [731 bytes]
- (hist) Authorship and Intellectual Property [729 bytes]
- (hist) Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition [728 bytes]
- (hist) Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions [727 bytes]
- (hist) Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering [727 bytes]
- (hist) Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct [726 bytes]
- (hist) Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education. [725 bytes]
- (hist) Bioethics: an introduction [725 bytes]
- (hist) Data management [725 bytes]
- (hist) The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what? [724 bytes]
- (hist) An empirical research study of the efficacy of two plagiarism-detection applications [722 bytes]
- (hist) Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation [721 bytes]
- (hist) Whistle blowing [721 bytes]
- (hist) The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [720 bytes]
- (hist) Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials [719 bytes]
- (hist) Open learning research ethics [719 bytes]
- (hist) Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES) [717 bytes]
- (hist) Collaborative science [714 bytes]
- (hist) Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? [713 bytes]
- (hist) Bias in hiring [711 bytes]
- (hist) Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications [710 bytes]
- (hist) Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit [709 bytes]
- (hist) Teaching Controversial Issues [709 bytes]
- (hist) The Danish National Research Foundation Act [708 bytes]
- (hist) University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents [708 bytes]
- (hist) Where are they now? [708 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct? It's all academic [708 bytes]
- (hist) Backstage Maneuvers [708 bytes]
- (hist) Pirated Idea for Research [708 bytes]
- (hist) Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts [708 bytes]
- (hist) Academic integrity checklist [707 bytes]
- (hist) Becoming an Ethical Researcher [705 bytes]
- (hist) A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks [703 bytes]
- (hist) The Croatian Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Rules of Procedure of the Ethics Committee. [702 bytes]
- (hist) Cases. Research Ethics Training Virtual Course [702 bytes]
- (hist) Recognizing scientific artifacts in biomedical literature [699 bytes]
- (hist) Responsible conduct in research [698 bytes]
- (hist) Handbook for Supporting Training Activities on the data protection Reform [697 bytes]
- (hist) The University of Oslo's Guidelines on Handling Conflicts [696 bytes]
- (hist) Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy [695 bytes]
- (hist) Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing [695 bytes]
- (hist) Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation [694 bytes]
- (hist) Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review [694 bytes]
- (hist) NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct [691 bytes]
- (hist) Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics [691 bytes]
- (hist) COPE flowcharts [691 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth [690 bytes]
