Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game
- Resource:31919f32-ed1b-4e05-a57f-6b6a41bcfaaa
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem
- ENERI Decision Tree
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner
- Good Research Practice (Swedish Research Council)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism"
- Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research (Policy brief)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices
- Disclosing Research Findings
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct
- Ethical code of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (2023), Slovak Academy of Sciences
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit
- Doing Global science
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy
- Procrastinating Reviewer
- Responsible authorship quick guide
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
- European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
- Reproducibility of methodology
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
- Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study
- Addressing the socio-economic consequences of research misconduct
- COPE core practices
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings
- Guide to Recommendations for Responsible Practices -2013 (2013), Brazilian Academy of Sciences
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code)
- 国家自然科学基金委员会 基础研究知识库开放获取政策实施细则 (2014), National Natural Science Foundation Committee (NSFC)
- Integrating a peer-taught module on practical research ethics into the graduate student orientation curriculum
- Multiple submission
- The Replication Crisis in Psychology
- A Survey of Doctoral Education in Communication Research Ethics
- Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial
- The ANR's open science policy (2023), Agence Natinale de la Recherche
- ROSIE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science (2023), Responsible Open Science in Europe (ROSiE)
- An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it.
- Research by Students
- UK Research Integrity Office's Case Study Collection
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors
- Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics
- Open Science Manifesto (2019), OSCDnet
