Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- The Case of the Missing Artefact
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
- The Reward Alliance
- Case Studies For Small Group Discussion
- European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct
- Withholding Study Purpose
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Brazilian Code of Good Scientific Practice (2014)
- Path2Integrity Campaign
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook
- Transpose
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities (2019)
- Contemporary Science, Values and Animal Subjects in Research
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people.
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs
- Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2017
- Honest refereeing
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts
- Albanian Regulation on Ethics in Research and Publishing ( 2012)
- Dual submissions
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk
- Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Data (2016), Research Council of Lithuania
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance
- Institutional Publishing Service Providers Guidelines
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- Research and scientific integrity policy (2018), National Research Council Canada
- European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct
- Resource:22290809-0b2e-47d3-9824-06b5aa3fb95e
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically
- CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTISTS (2017)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review
