Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy
- ENRIO Collection
- Authorship in scholarly manuscripts: practical considerations for resident and early career physicians
- Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2)
- What's in That Bottle? What's in That Pipe?
- The Danish National Research Foundation Act
- CIOMS International guidelines on good governance practice for research institutions
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice
- Law on Science and Studies of the Republic of Lithuania
- Image manipulation as a general practice
- Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy
- History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research
- Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council
- False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial
- Payments to young researchers in Malawi
- Australian Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research
- Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism
- Teacher guidelines in early bioethical education
- Developing Informed Research Participants in an Introductory Psychology Participant Pool
- A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr)
- Reporting Adverse Effects
- Edanz. Writing Point: How To Write About Your Study Limitations Without Limiting Your Impact
- Guidelines for Ethical Review
- Teaching about the First World War today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals
- European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) Patient Registry Code of Conduct
- Your preprint pre-posting checklist
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work
- UK Guidance on Reproducibility and Reliability of Biomedical Research: Improving Research Practices
- Anticipate and Communicate. Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications
- Data management checklist
- European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) Code of Conduct
- Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's
- A meta-analysis of studies of publication misrepresentation by applicants to residency and fellowship programs
- Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea
- Plagiarism and Fabrication in Public Health Research at Harvard
- EnRRIch project- tool for educators
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education
- UKRIO's Position statement on research involving security-sensitive material
- Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition
- Retraction of Savine, McDaniel, Shelton, and Scullin
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication
