What is this about? (Is About)
From The Embassy of Good Science
A short summary providing some details about the theme/resource (max. 75 words)
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
W
Diese Übung soll dazu anregen, über Research Integrity Situationen und Dilemmata nachzudenken. Im Fokus steht dabei, wie eine Reflexion über Werte (oder den eigenen moralischen Charakter) den einzelnen Wissenschaftler:innen dabei helfen kann, sich bewusst für eine Handlungsoption zu entscheiden, die ihren persönlichen Motiven und Werten entspricht (Pennock, R. T. & O’Rourke, M. Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training. Sci. Eng. Ethics 23, 243–262 (2017).). In dieser Übung werden zuerst Werte besprochen und reflektiert, und dann in Handlungsnormen umgewandelt. Auf dich werden Fragen zukommen wie bspw.: „Was sollte ich tun, um in dieser Situation dem Wert/der Tugend Ehrlichkeit gerecht zu werden?“, „Wie kann ich zuverlässig sein?“. Die Übung hilft dir dabei, darüber nachzudenken, welche Art von Wissenschaftler:in du sein möchtest. Die Übung regt auch dazu an, darüber nachzudenken, was für uns in schwierigen und eingeschränkten Situationen „erstrebenswerte“ Verhaltensweisen sind. +
Diese Übung soll dazu einladen, über Research Integrity Situationen und Dilemmata nachzudenken. Sie verbindet den werte- und tugend-basierten Ansatz mit der Forschungspraxis und dadurch mit konkreten Handlungsoptionen (Pennock, R. T. & O’Rourke, M. Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training. Sci. Eng. Ethics 23, 243–262 (2017).). Die Werte/Tugenden werden im Kontext von Research Integrity reflektiert und in Handlungsnormen umgewandelt. +
This factual case discusses an analysis of research misconduct investigations into a particular and significant case of scientific misconduct. The investigators reviewed several misconduct reports regarding this instance and found that all reports were inadequate.
'"`UNIQ--references-00000001-QINU`"' +
What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? +
This study addresses crucial ethical issues in nursing and emphasizes potential conflicts that nurses have to deal with. These issues regard informed consent, beneficence-do not harm, respect for anonymity and confidentiality and respect for privacy. Authors highlight that due to lack of clarity in ethical standards, nurses must develop an awareness of these issues and an adequate framework to cope with them. +
This article emphasizes difficulties that editors face in pursuing cases of suspected research misconduct. The authors highlight the need for better training and guidance for editors as well as more cooperation from relevant institutions. +
This blog post describes circumstances that led to the retraction of a paper about gender dysphoria. +
This is a factual case. +
The manuscript published on Nature is on researcher 'self-reflection on the retraction of one of his paper. +
Linked to the case of Olivier Voinnet, the blog presents an example of publishers' response to authors whose past papers have been retracted or have had corrections issued on them. +
This opinion piece discusses the function of retraction notices, and addresses the criticisms that are often made of them - that they are opaque and uninformative. The article proposes five criteria for disclosing information in retraction notices to make them better. +
An archaeologist is uncertain whether it is ethical to drink with or purchase alcohol for Native Americans of the Southwest, given that many reservations are dry and the historical issues caused to native populations by alcohol. +
This factual case describes various instances of sociological research in which the research subjects are deceived. The deceit comes in many forms, from not telling the participants that they are taking part in research to the researcher disguising him or herself to collect data. Some researchers argue that the deceit is justified by the fact that it leads to better research, whilst others argue that it harms the participant's interest and obscures the data. +
A student applies inappropriate procedures in research with rats because of a lack of training. +
A brief retrospective look at some past fraud investigations, showing that, whether researchers are found to be guilty or innocent, the wounds are slow to heal. The afterlife of Jon Sudbo, Andres Pape Moller, Jan Hendrik Schön, Thereza Imanishi-Kari, Woo Suk Hwang, Luk Van Parisj, Bengü Sezen, Shinichi Fujimura. +
A student who has been working in a lab discovers the head of the lab is engaging in serious misconduct. The student thinks she has solid evidence to demonstrate the misconduct. However, she hopes to obtain a PhD position in this lab. +
This is a factual case. +
A federal agency threatened to withhold a researcher's salary unless he turned over his notes he had written on the proposed topographic changes in an indigenous area in the far north of America. The researcher's report noted that the changes would radically change the culture of the area and this change could not be mitigated. The federal agency funding him wanted him to turn over the notes so they could get a second opinion. +
There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist are almost exclusively focused on medicine-related areas. In the present article we detail a case of editorial misconduct in a rather underexplored domain, the social sciences. This case demonstrates that although legal systems provide different instruments of protection to avoid, compensate for, and punish misconduct on the part of journal editors, the social and economic power unbalance between authors and publishers suggests the importance of alternative solutions before or instead of bringing a lawsuit to court. It puts forward strong arguments in favour of the need for effective regulatory bodies so as to achieve and maintain a culture of research integrity by ''all'' involved in the process. +
This is about the suicide of Jason Altom, a Harvard graduate studen that, was widely reported in the media. With this tragic background, the case discusses the role of mentorship in research settings. A different monitoring system for the quality of graduate students' supervision is suggested, where anonymous evaluation is enabled.. +
A researcher wants to test an intervention to prevent child abuse among pregnant women in drug treatment programs but feels that revealing the true aim of the intervention may upset women already in difficult life circumstances (and limit enrollment). She asks her institution’s IRB for permission to tell potential participants that the study is a parenting skills development rather than child abuse prevention program. +
