Why is this important? (Important Because)

From The Embassy of Good Science
A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)


  • ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
Showing 20 pages using this property.
E
This code of conduct explicitly defines appropriate conduct for members and affiliates of the ECPR.  +
47 Member States of the Council of Europe have signed the European Convention on Human Rights. Besides, any violation of the ECHR can be taken to the European Court of Human Rights. The European Convention on Human Rights has been endorsed by several European societies like the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.  +
The ECFS Patient Registry collects demographic and clinical data from consenting people with cystic fibrosis in Europe. The information is used to deepen our understanding of cystic fibrosis, improve standards of care, and to facilitate public health planning. This code of conduct details the ways in which the registry should be used.  +
This meta code of conduct provides guidance for the content of the ethical codes of the EFPA's member associations, and details the ethical principles that member associations should adhere to.  +
This model code of conduct reflects the shared understanding of the values of the EFPA's member organizations, and seeks to provide principles and guidelines by which individual psychologists and organizations can inform the practice of psychology and enhance professional competence.  +
This code of conduct aims to promote ethical integrity and an inclusive, constructive and positive approach to science by outlining the expected and required behaviour of members and participants of EGU activities.  +
This code of conduct outlines the reposnsibilities of mathematicians, as well as all who are concerned with the publication, dissemination, and assessment of mathematical research in Europe.  +
Via their code of conduct, the EMS provides guidelines for individuals of the meteorological community in Europe on how to communicate honestly and reliably with the general public, including the media, on issues of meteorology and in particular on complex or controversial issues such as climate change.  +
While the European Code of Conduct is focused on research integrity (RI) in a broader sense, this ENRIO Handbook aims to offer further specifics on section 3.2 of the Code “Dealing with Violations and Allegations of Misconduct”. The Handbook consists of detailed practical recommendations on how to deal with research misconduct and other unacceptable practices. On the European level, research integrity is much more on the agenda compared to 10-15 years ago. This leaves room for soft harmonization which is one of the main purposes of this Handbook.  +
This code of conduct details the core ethical standards that apply to professionals from industry, the academic world, research centres and authorities in the field of nuclear science.  +
These Standards of conduct details the ethical expectations that apply to all members of the association.  +
Their code of conduct, which is co-owned by the International Chamber of Commerce, champions good research and the adherence to profesional standards.  +
This is a thought provoking case that provides some philosophical questions on what is legal and ethical. Issues around informed consent, the role of the IRB and the funding of the study are also discussed.  +
With this module we want to help trainers to convey the importance of fairness, transparency and ethical considerations in AI systems, fostering a deeper understanding and commitment to responsible AI among their participants.  +
F
FAIR data is more transparent and reproducible, which is why it is an important aspect of research integrity.  +
The credibility of scientific research hinges on transparency and ethical authorship practices. Selling authorship compromises these principles, leading to fraudulent publications, misrepresentation of expertise, and potential misuse of findings. This practice often stems from pressure to "publish or perish" in academia, incentivizing unethical behavior. Left unchecked, it erodes public trust in science and creates an uneven playing field for honest researchers. Addressing this issue is essential to safeguard the future of scientific integrity and uphold academic standards. By understanding the factors driving this problem, readers can explore potential solutions and contribute to fostering a culture of ethical research practices.  +
In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies.  +
Pharmaceutical companies and drug manufactures "fund such studies hoping to show that their drugs cause fewer side effects or are more effective than competing products."'"`UNIQ--ref-0000014D-QINU`"' Rules and regulations related to studying existing drugs need to be adapted to showcase transparency and to ensure results - positive or negative- are published.  +
This code of conduct lays out general principles that those pariticipating in EPHAR activities must abide by.  +
Via their code of conduct, Eurotox provides guidelines for the professional conduct of its members.  +
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.2.9