Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America
- Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data
- Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
- Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes
- Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing
- Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images
- IFLA Statement on Open Access to Scholarly Literature and Research Documentation (2003), International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1)
- Research with human subjects
- Guidance Document for Conducting Internet Research
- A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study
- Freedom from Harassment - Awareness Raising by PREPARED
- Lebanonian Charter of ethics and guiding principles of scientific research 2016
- The publication of controversial views
- Meta-Analysis Map: relevant factors shaping public attitudes of science communication - policy brief
- Errata
- The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Consultation paper – Research Ethics in Norway
- Anonymity Declined
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation
- Instructor's guide to prepare research group leader as RCR Mentors
- Maintaining Competence
- Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication
- Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
- How to make the digital scholarly monograph fit for Open Access by applying smart services and tools
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity (2021)
- Integrity in scientific research videos
- Lab Management instructions
- Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska;dean of research resigns
- A case on deepfake AI-based psychotherapy for processing trauma and grief
- Generalised methodology for ethical assessment of emerging technologies
- Reaction to bias
- Valuing Voices Tool
- Croatia's science minister rejects calls to resign amid plagiarism scandal
- Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Communicators
- Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct
- DIAMOND OPEN ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR INSTITUTIONS, FUNDERS, SPONSORS, DONORS, AND POLICYMAKERS
- Ethics Approval, Quarantees of Quality and the Meddlesome Editor
- The lab movie
- Data fabrication in a rejected manuscript
- Policy on Ethics and Scientific Integrity (2014), Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man
- Improving epistemological beliefs and moral judgment through an STS-based science ethics education program
- Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal
- ORI Infographics
- The Cape Town Statement on Fostering Research Integrity through Fairness and Equity (2022)
- Herbicide Resistant Rice
- Valuing Voices Tool
