Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
- Annual review of ethics (case studies)
- FAPESP's Open Access Policy (2019), São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes
- Is the famous emeritus professor self-plagiarising?
- UKRIO Code of Practice for Research (2023), UK Research Integrity Office
- Columbia grad student faked data in study of socioeconomics and life experiences, says retraction notice
- Supporting Health Data Cooperatives in Europe (Policy brief)
- Training and Resources in Research Ethics Evaluation (TRREE) e-learning
- History Educators in the Western Balkans Participate in New Training with “Once Upon a Time…We Lived Together. 1900-1945”
- Ten short cases on publication ethics
- Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2017)
- ETHICAL CODE OF THE COMMITTEE FOR ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION (2015), Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- Bioethics: an introduction
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario
- Deuxième Plan National pour la science ouverte (2021), Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation
- Authorship and publication
- European Meteorological Society (EMS) Code of Practice for communicating knowledge on climate change to the public
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale
- Australian Codes for the Responsible Conduct of Research
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise
- Recognizing scientific artifacts in biomedical literature
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper
- Authorship in a Multi-Center Clinical Trial: the HF-ACTION Experience
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans
- Salvador Declaration on Open Access: the developing world perspective (2005), Participants of the International Seminar on Open Access
- Ethics Code of the Slovak Academy of Sciences: Addendum
- Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research.
- The Runaway Wife
- Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors
- Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- German Council of Science and Humanities' Requirements for the Quality Assurance of the Doctorate
- SHERPA Final Recommendations
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Resource:A2d0fbfb-d762-4868-8768-c0adfbb46ac0
- The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions
- Joint position paper of the General Faculty (AFT) and the German University Association (DHV)
- Towards an enhanced and aligned institutional publishing landscape in the ERA - policy brief
- European Association of Social Psychology (EASP) Code of Conduct
- Cape Town Statement on Research Integrity
- The Larnaca College (Cyprus) Statement on Research Integrity
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations
- Intellectual property and power imbalance
- The Student Statement on The Right to Research (R2RC) (2025), Right to Research Coalition (R2RC)
- Lapses in Oversight Compromise Omics Results
- Asia Pacific APEC Guiding Principles for Research Integrity 2022
- Charter of ethics and guiding principles of scientific research in Lebanon (2016), Mouin Hamzé, Nayef Saade, Fawaz Fawaz
- Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies
