Oldest pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Reproducibility of methodology (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Multiple submission (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Open Science Manifesto (2019), OSCDnet (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Vulnerable Populations (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- It’s Still Plagiarism (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Eigenfactorizer (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Collaboration dispute (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- CROATIAN OPEN ACCESS DECLARATION (2012), Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Brussels Declaration on Open Access (2012), Federal Science Policy, Wallonia-Brussels Federation, and Flemish Ministry for Economy, Science, and Innovation (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- PREPARED Guidance for Fair and Fast Desk Assessment of Submitted Manuscripts during Times of Crisis (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- THE CONCORDAT TO SUPPORT RESEARCH INTEGRITY (2019), Universities UK (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Japan fails to settle university dispute (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- COPE Cases (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Author’s Permission Guidelines (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Handling self-admissions of fraud (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2) (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Image manipulation as a general practice (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Manuscript Guidelines Journals (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2014), Ministry of Higher Education and Science (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Reporting Full Findings (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Publication and data ownership (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Fabrication and falsification (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) (17:53, 2 June 2026)
- WHO Policy on Open Access (17:53, 2 June 2026)
