What is this about? (Is About)

From The Embassy of Good Science
A short summary providing some details about the theme/resource (max. 75 words)


  • ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
Showing 20 pages using this property.
E
This document is an addendum to the Slovak Academy of Sciences' Code of Ehtics (please refer to "Related Resources". Of note, it states taht researchers should not publish their output in untrustworthy or predatory journals.  +
The following framework supports the ethical preparation, implementation, and evaluation of participatory processes in research funding and (applied) research & innovation (R&I). It helps the user understand the context in which they undertake a participatory process and guides them through mapping and addressing the ethical challenges and limitations that might arise. The framework was developed with a focus on the activities of research funding organizations (RFOs), including participation in strategy development and agenda setting, call topic definition and formulation, (project and proposal) evaluation processes, and R&I projects. It thus addresses different contexts, resources, and needs that impact decisions on how to conduct participatory processes in an ethical manner, and provides guidance to ensure stakeholder participation is executed without disregarding values such as fairness, transparency, equality, and privacy. Through this, it might also support future ethics review and evaluation procedures that assess the planning and implementation of participatory processes and offer a common frame of reference for different stakeholders to discuss and understand participation in R&I. The Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations were developed in the context of the H2020-project PRO-Ethics [grant number 872441]. The framework reflects the theoretical and empirical data and experiences collected in this time, as analyzed and synthesized by the authors of this document with support from the project consortium. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the European Commission.  +
The following framework supports the ethical preparation, implementation, and evaluation of participatory processes in research funding and (applied) research & innovation (R&I). It helps the user understand the context in which they undertake a participatory process and guides them through mapping and addressing the ethical challenges and limitations that might arise. The framework was developed with a focus on the activities of research funding organizations (RFOs), including participation in strategy development and agenda setting, call topic definition and formulation, (project and proposal) evaluation processes, and R&I projects. It thus addresses different contexts, resources, and needs that impact decisions on how to conduct participatory processes in an ethical manner, and provides guidance to ensure stakeholder participation is executed without disregarding values such as fairness, transparency, equality, and privacy. Through this, it might also support future ethics review and evaluation procedures that assess the planning and implementation of participatory processes and offer a common frame of reference for different stakeholders to discuss and understand participation in R&I. The Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations were developed in the context of the H2020-project PRO-Ethics [grant number 872441]. The framework reflects the theoretical and empirical data and experiences collected in this time, as analyzed and synthesized by the authors of this document with support from the project consortium. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the European Commission.  +
This framework supports the ethical preparation, implementation, and evaluation of participatory processes in research funding and (applied) research & innovation (R&I). It helps the user understand the context in which they undertake a participatory process and guides them through mapping and addressing the ethical challenges and limitations that might arise. The framework addresses different contexts, resources, and needs that impact decisions on how to conduct participatory processes in an ethical manner for Research Funding Organisations (RFOs), and provides guidance to ensure stakeholder participation is executed without disregarding values such as fairness, transparency, equality, and privacy.  +
This article proposes the use of the Ethics Requirement Score, a bibliometric index, in scientific healthcare journals for evaluating ethics criteria in scientific publication.  +
The paper discusses several instances in the past where research ethics requirements - protecting the rights of children participants - were not adequately followed.  +
Ever wondered about the ethical compass guiding scientific discovery? This video highlights the long history of teaching and learning, tracing it all the way back to Plato's Academy. While the specific subjects taught have evolved over time, the underlying ethical questions remain relevant. Ethics in research is not merely about compliance but also about moral reflection. Drawing on real-world examples, our training module aims to provide guidance and support for researchers in navigating ethical considerations.  +
This glossary aims at providing common ground for enlightened conversation in the realm of ethics and leadership. More than 50 animated two-minute videos define key ethics terms and behavioral ethics concepts.  +
The document ''Ethics in Social Sciences and Humanities'' was developed by the European Commission with the specific aim to help researchers working in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). The document addresses particular ethical issues that SSH researchers face in preparing and performing research. Topics covered include methodology, informed consent, unexpected findings, data protection, research sites, misuse of research, ethical approval and management issues.  +
This article provides advices how to cope with ethical issues that may occur during research. The authors present a framework, describe a methodology and provide with two examples from educational research. <br />  +
The rise of digital psychiatry brings both opportunities and ethical challenges. Technologies such as AI-driven diagnostics, mental health apps, and telepsychiatry services promise greater accessibility, but they also raise concerns about privacy, trust, equity, and bias. Without clear rules and oversight, it’s important to consider their impact.  +
More than 50 case studies match ethics concepts to real world situations. From journalism to performing arts to foreign policy to scientific research to social work, these cases explore a range of current and historic ethical dilemmas, their motivating biases, and their consequences.  +
This fictional case describes the human rights and ethical implications of vaccine trials in low-income communities and countries. Two short, fictional scenarios are analysed from both perspectives. The case revolves around two key points: the informed consent and comprehension of the research by the potential participants and the question to what extend persuasion by the trail conductor is justifiable. '"`UNIQ--references-0000000F-QINU`"'  +
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is an association of more than 11,000 clinicians, researchers and allied health professionals from over 50 national societies dedicated to improving the health of people affected by allergic diseases.  +
The European Association of Archaeologists is a learned society for professional archaeologists in Europe and beyond, with a total of more than 15,000 members.  +
The European Association of Archaeologists is a learned society for professional archaeologists in Europe and beyond, with a total of more than 15,000 members.  +
The European Association of Archaeologists is a learned society for professional archaeologists in Europe and beyond, with a total of more than 15,000 members.  +
The European Association of Social Psychology aims to promote excellence in and improve the quality of social psychological research in Europe.  +
The European Astronomical Society, founded in 1990, aims to promote and advance astronomy in Europe.  +
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.2.9