Orphaned pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The Embassy of Good Science.
50 s ordered by recently added
- European Charter of Patients' Rights
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education
- Vulnerable Populations
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity?
- Possible Conflict of Interest
- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- INSPIRE
- Academic medical centers and medical research: the challenges ahead
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’
- Manchester University's Data Protection Policy
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research
- Intellectual property
- Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting
- Witness to Murder
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct?
- Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions
- UKRIO's Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity
- Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI
- Integrity in Scientific Research Video Series
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth)
- Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework
- The Case of the Missing Artefact
- Withholding Study Purpose
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people.
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks
- Honest refereeing
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual
- Dual submissions
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration
- Resource:22290809-0b2e-47d3-9824-06b5aa3fb95e
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements
