Short pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct [726 bytes]
- (hist) Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering [727 bytes]
- (hist) Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions [727 bytes]
- (hist) Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition [728 bytes]
- (hist) Authorship and Intellectual Property [729 bytes]
- (hist) Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC [731 bytes]
- (hist) Developing Informed Research Participants in an Introductory Psychology Participant Pool [731 bytes]
- (hist) A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics [731 bytes]
- (hist) Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct [732 bytes]
- (hist) How can we provide effective training for research ethics committee members? A European assessment [732 bytes]
- (hist) Studying Vulnerable Individuals [732 bytes]
- (hist) Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh [732 bytes]
- (hist) German Council of Science and Humanities' Requirements for the Quality Assurance of the Doctorate [732 bytes]
- (hist) Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial [733 bytes]
- (hist) PRINTEGER [733 bytes]
- (hist) Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework [734 bytes]
- (hist) Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media [735 bytes]
- (hist) What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? [735 bytes]
- (hist) One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal [736 bytes]
- (hist) Mentoring International Post Docs [736 bytes]
- (hist) The Danish Act on the Innovation Fund [736 bytes]
- (hist) The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones [737 bytes]
- (hist) Resource:F099b32a-f559-4988-b5c6-26275b35197a [738 bytes]
- (hist) Springer Nature ‘continuing to investigate the concerns raised’ about paper linking obesity and lying [738 bytes]
- (hist) Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research [740 bytes]
- (hist) Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study [741 bytes]
- (hist) Dispute Over Primary Authorship [741 bytes]
- (hist) Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors [742 bytes]
- (hist) Journal peer review [744 bytes]
- (hist) HEIRRI courses [747 bytes]
- (hist) The research Clinic movie [747 bytes]
- (hist) 3 things societies can do to promote research integrity [748 bytes]
- (hist) Writing usable qualitative health research findings [748 bytes]
- (hist) Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance [748 bytes]
- (hist) Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research [749 bytes]
- (hist) Rules of Data-Sharing in Collaborative and Non-Collaborative Research [749 bytes]
- (hist) Co-Authorship Conflicts [751 bytes]
- (hist) The lab movie [752 bytes]
- (hist) Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results [752 bytes]
- (hist) Guidance Document for Conducting Internet Research [754 bytes]
- (hist) The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis [755 bytes]
- (hist) Interactive Guide: Basic research Concepts [756 bytes]
- (hist) Technician Error Leads to Harm of Animal Subjects [756 bytes]
- (hist) Nagoya Protocol [756 bytes]
- (hist) Anonymity Declined [757 bytes]
- (hist) CIOMS International guidelines on good governance practice for research institutions [757 bytes]
- (hist) Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner [759 bytes]
- (hist) Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct [759 bytes]
- (hist) The Suspect Questionnaire [760 bytes]
- (hist) Scenarios for ethics modules in RCR [761 bytes]
