View source for Resource:E79b824c-1756-40b9-a0d6-80045febf3b8

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Baltimore Case - In Brief
|Is About=Three months after a widely-leaked draft report by the Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) accused an immunologist of fabricating data in a 1986 Cell article, the controversy has become more intense. A series of published statements in Nature has catalyzed a bitter debate within the biomedical community. This is a factual case.
|Important Because=When an article is published, all authors are responsible for what is written in the paper. If the paper contains fabricated data, all the authors are deemed to be responsible.
|Important For=Researchers
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/253/5015/24.1.abstract
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Theme=Theme:Ab4200ca-c14d-413d-a9f6-aa5a93e1800e
}}
{{Tags
|Involves=Imanishi-Kari
|Has Timepoint=1986 - 1991
|Has Location=USA; United States
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
}}