Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Whistleblowing and the monitoring of research misconduct; Barriers to reporting cases of research misconduct; Power imbalances between students/early-career4 KB (432 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Research with humans The impact of the GDPR on scientific data Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Balancing harms and benefits4 KB (436 words) - 15:24, 19 October 2021
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Non-reporting of negative findings Outcome reporting bias P-value hacking Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Bias Experimental4 KB (407 words) - 15:20, 19 October 2021
- Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)guidelines to handle cases of alleged research misconduct. The objective of the guidelines was to recognise research misconduct and to establish common norms1 KB (151 words) - 14:39, 20 October 2020
- Legal rights of accused scientists (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)policies and procedures for research misconduct Research misconduct Transparency Allegations of misconduct Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (174 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct (section Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct)Resources Guidelines In order to maintain high standards of research integrity, allegations of misconduct are taken seriously at the Dublin City University (DCU)759 bytes (58 words) - 11:27, 28 September 2022
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)guidelines Fairness Honesty Responsibility Respect Allegation of Misconduct Citing Complaints procedure Conflict of Interest Editorial review Good Practice Peer4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- Fabrication (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Fabrication is one of the most severe violations of research integrity. It is considered serious research misconduct. In the European Code of Conduct fabrication3 KB (370 words) - 12:08, 16 October 2020
- About Scenarios Open About Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Anonymization Authorship Bias Beneficence Citing Collaborative6 KB (646 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- difficult decisions about allegations of misconduct, authorship disputes, conflicts of interest, lack of ethical oversight of a submission, and so on. The3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- ‘right’ answer All stakeholders in research Research misconduct UKRIO United Kingdom Allegations of misconduct1 KB (164 words) - 12:36, 30 September 2020
- The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct (section European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct)States Honesty Respect Allegations of misconduct Research misconduct Whistleblowing Mentor/trainee relationship Allegations of misconduct Data management Authorship2 KB (235 words) - 11:47, 23 October 2020
- violations of good research practice or allegations of misconduct are handled in different countries. However, it always is in the interest of society and5 KB (539 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- Belgium Reliability Honesty Authorship Conflict of interest Plagiarism Data management Allegations of misconduct811 bytes (82 words) - 10:24, 22 September 2020
- second volume on responsible research, the result of the panel of experts of the National Academy of Sciences. It includes papers and institutional reports921 bytes (85 words) - 13:41, 29 September 2020
- COPE flowcharts (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Publication ethics Peer review Conflict of interest Intellectual property Data management Allegations of misconduct https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Flowcharts691 bytes (67 words) - 09:34, 27 May 2020
- the first volume of textbook on resposnible research and the result of a two-year study by a panel of experts of the National Academy of Sciences. It investigates945 bytes (91 words) - 13:39, 29 September 2020
- Research misconduct Authorship Conflict of interest Data management Reproducability Peer review Intellectual property Allegations of misconduct1,020 bytes (112 words) - 17:23, 19 August 2021
- guidelines. Research misconduct: Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory24 KB (2,121 words) - 11:14, 10 April 2024
- management Social responsibilities Safety Work environment Allegations of misconduct Conflict of interest Authorship916 bytes (78 words) - 13:04, 29 September 2020