Difference between revisions of "Theme:65e6f304-51e2-4e41-93d3-e48518248b39"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
In particular, those research areas in which practitioners also offer services to clients, such as sociologists, psychologists, or statisticians, have well-established domain-specific codes of conduct.
 
In particular, those research areas in which practitioners also offer services to clients, such as sociologists, psychologists, or statisticians, have well-established domain-specific codes of conduct.
|Important For=phd students
+
|Important For=PhD students; Supervisors; Junior researchers; Early career researchers; Senior researchers
 
|Has Reference=a
 
|Has Reference=a
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
 
|Related To Resource=Resource:Ad7f9f5c-a519-4744-a7c6-5fba091e9264
 
|Related To Resource=Resource:Ad7f9f5c-a519-4744-a7c6-5fba091e9264
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:2446855b-0acc-4e28-817e-a65d7e00162e
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags}}
 
{{Tags}}

Revision as of 12:08, 27 May 2020

Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity

What is this about?

Some guidelines concern all areas of research, but there are also codes and guidelines which concern specific scientific disciplines or areas

Why is this important?

Some scientific areas can have domain-specific challenges when it comes to research integrity. That is why it can be important to have more specific guidelines than those available in domain-general guidelines.

In particular, those research areas in which practitioners also offer services to clients, such as sociologists, psychologists, or statisticians, have well-established domain-specific codes of conduct.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6