Difference between revisions of "Theme:721dc5c7-8e47-41ca-a7b8-73d6a225c3c3"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theme | {{Theme | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
| + | |Has Parent Theme=Theme:721dc5c7-8e47-41ca-a7b8-73d6a225c3c3 | ||
|Title=Networks and projects promoting research integrity | |Title=Networks and projects promoting research integrity | ||
|Is About=Across the world networks and projects have been established to promote research integrity. These networks and projects aim to foster responsible research integrity practices. | |Is About=Across the world networks and projects have been established to promote research integrity. These networks and projects aim to foster responsible research integrity practices. | ||
| + | |Important Because=Effective policymaking, built upon sound research, produces outcomes that benefit society, communities, groups and individuals. If research is flawed by lacking integrity and by being conducted unethically it should be of no use to policymakers. Fraud or corrupt practices by researchers can lead to serious damage to society and the physical environment. Reliable and transparent research, divorced from political ideology and undeclared vested interests, produces robust evidence that benefits social wellbeing and societal progress. Ethical values, principles and standards need to be embedded in the ‘culture’ of research and science policy must recognise that need and the most effective way to support it. | ||
|Important For=All stakeholders in research | |Important For=All stakeholders in research | ||
|Has Best Practice='''Networks''' | |Has Best Practice='''Networks''' | ||
| − | * [https://allea.org/ ALLEA] (All European Academies) | + | *[https://allea.org/ ALLEA] (All European Academies) |
| − | * [https://amsterdamresearchclimate.nl/ ARCA] (Amsterdam Research Climate) | + | *[https://amsterdamresearchclimate.nl/ ARCA] (Amsterdam Research Climate) |
| − | * [https://publicationethics.org/ COPE] (The Committee on Publication Ethics ) | + | *[https://publicationethics.org/ COPE] (The Committee on Publication Ethics ) |
| − | * [https://ease.org.uk/about-us/ EASE] (The European Association of Science Editors) | + | *[https://ease.org.uk/about-us/ EASE] (The European Association of Science Editors) |
| − | * [http://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/ ENAI] (European Network for Academic Integrity) | + | *[http://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/ ENAI] (European Network for Academic Integrity) |
| − | * [http://www.enohe.net/ ENOHE] (European Network of Ombuds in Higher Education) | + | *[http://eneri.eu/ ENERI] (European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity) |
| − | * [http://www.enrio.eu/ ENRIO] (European Network for Research Integrity Officers) | + | *[http://www.enohe.net/ ENOHE] (European Network of Ombuds in Higher Education) |
| − | * [https://www.eosc-portal.eu/ EOSC] (European Open Science Cloud) | + | *[http://www.enrio.eu/ ENRIO] (European Network for Research Integrity Officers) |
| − | * [https://www.equator-network.org/ EQUATOR Network] (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) | + | *[https://www.eosc-portal.eu/ EOSC] (European Open Science Cloud) |
| − | * [http://www.eurecnet.org/index.html EUREC] (European Network of Research Ethics Committees ) | + | *[https://www.equator-network.org/ EQUATOR Network] (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) |
| − | * [https://irafpa.org/en/ IRAFPA] (Institute of Research and Action on Fraud and Plagiarism in Academia) | + | *[http://www.eurecnet.org/index.html EUREC] (European Network of Research Ethics Committees ) |
| − | * [https://lari.lu/ LARI] (the Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity) | + | *[https://irafpa.org/en/ IRAFPA] (Institute of Research and Action on Fraud and Plagiarism in Academia) |
| − | * [ | + | *[https://lari.lu/ LARI] (the Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity) |
| − | * [https://www.wcrif.org/ WCRIF] (World Conference on Research Integrity Foundation) | + | *[https://www.scienceeurope.org/our-priorities/research-integrity-and-ethics/ Science Europe] |
| + | *[https://www.wcrif.org/ WCRIF] (World Conference on Research Integrity Foundation) | ||
'''Projects''' | '''Projects''' | ||
| − | * [http://entireconsortium.eu/ EnTIRE] (Mapping Normative Frameworks for EThics and Integrity of REsearch) | + | *[http://entireconsortium.eu/ EnTIRE] (Mapping Normative Frameworks for EThics and Integrity of REsearch) |
| − | * [https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/ FOSTER] (Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science) | + | *[https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/ FOSTER] (Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science) |
| − | * [http://h2020integrity.eu/ INTEGRITY] | + | *[http://h2020integrity.eu/ INTEGRITY] |
| − | * [https://www.nrin.nl/about/inspire-project/ INSPIRE] (Inventory in the Netherlands of Stakeholders' Practices and Initiatives on Research Integrity to set an Example) | + | *[https://www.nrin.nl/about/inspire-project/ INSPIRE] (Inventory in the Netherlands of Stakeholders' Practices and Initiatives on Research Integrity to set an Example) |
| − | * [https://on-merrit.eu/ ON-MERRIT] (Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research & Innovation Transition) | + | *[https://on-merrit.eu/ ON-MERRIT] (Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research & Innovation Transition) |
| − | * [https://www.openaire.eu/ OpenAIRE] | + | *[https://www.openaire.eu/ OpenAIRE] |
| − | * [https://www.path2integrity.eu/ Path2Integrity] | + | *[https://www.path2integrity.eu/ Path2Integrity] |
| − | * [https://printeger.eu/ Printeger] (Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research) | + | *[https://printeger.eu/ Printeger] (Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research) |
| − | * [https://satoriproject.eu/ SATORI] | + | *[https://satoriproject.eu/ SATORI] |
| − | * [https://www.sops4ri.eu/ SOPs4RI] (Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity) | + | *[https://www.sops4ri.eu/ SOPs4RI] (Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity) |
| − | * [http://trust-project.eu/ TRUST] | + | *[http://trust-project.eu/ TRUST] |
| − | * [http://virt2ueconsortium.eu/ VIRT2UE] (Virtue-based ethics and Integrity of Research: Train-the-Trainer program for Upholding the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity) | + | *[http://virt2ueconsortium.eu/ VIRT2UE] (Virtue-based ethics and Integrity of Research: Train-the-Trainer program for Upholding the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity) |
| − | + | *The [https://prores-project.eu/ PRO-RES] Framework for Ethical Evidence | |
| − | + | |Has Detail=The PRO-RES Framework is built upon a set of resources that both help to generate ethical research and assess its integrity. The resources are operationalised in a toolbox that includes several means for assessing ethical research. The final ‘pillar’ in the PRO-RES Framework is ‘The Accord’ – a statement of principles for ethical evidence-gathering that individuals, agencies and organisations can sign up to as an assurance of their best intentions when gathering and using evidence to inform policies. | |
| − | |||
| − | * | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:3c6a13ad-6861-4a5f-bf5b-491693ee6b6d | + | |Related To Resource=Resource:2cf6e05e-5a61-4896-bcb9-80de10ad21b8 |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:3c6a13ad-6861-4a5f-bf5b-491693ee6b6d;Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:B4f3369c-e0ac-4cf5-acd9-cb2a6c11181d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability; Respect; Accountability | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability; Respect; Accountability | ||
| + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research Integrity; Research ethics | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:02, 3 July 2023
ThemesNetworks and projects promoting research integrity
What is this about?
Across the world networks and projects have been established to promote research integrity. These networks and projects aim to foster responsible research integrity practices.
Why is this important?
Effective policymaking, built upon sound research, produces outcomes that benefit society, communities, groups and individuals. If research is flawed by lacking integrity and by being conducted unethically it should be of no use to policymakers. Fraud or corrupt practices by researchers can lead to serious damage to society and the physical environment. Reliable and transparent research, divorced from political ideology and undeclared vested interests, produces robust evidence that benefits social wellbeing and societal progress. Ethical values, principles and standards need to be embedded in the ‘culture’ of research and science policy must recognise that need and the most effective way to support it.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
Networks
- ALLEA (All European Academies)
- ARCA (Amsterdam Research Climate)
- COPE (The Committee on Publication Ethics )
- EASE (The European Association of Science Editors)
- ENAI (European Network for Academic Integrity)
- ENERI (European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity)
- ENOHE (European Network of Ombuds in Higher Education)
- ENRIO (European Network for Research Integrity Officers)
- EOSC (European Open Science Cloud)
- EQUATOR Network (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research)
- EUREC (European Network of Research Ethics Committees )
- IRAFPA (Institute of Research and Action on Fraud and Plagiarism in Academia)
- LARI (the Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity)
- Science Europe
- WCRIF (World Conference on Research Integrity Foundation)
Projects
- EnTIRE (Mapping Normative Frameworks for EThics and Integrity of REsearch)
- FOSTER (Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science)
- INTEGRITY
- INSPIRE (Inventory in the Netherlands of Stakeholders' Practices and Initiatives on Research Integrity to set an Example)
- ON-MERRIT (Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research & Innovation Transition)
- OpenAIRE
- Path2Integrity
- Printeger (Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research)
- SATORI
- SOPs4RI (Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity)
- TRUST
- VIRT2UE (Virtue-based ethics and Integrity of Research: Train-the-Trainer program for Upholding the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity)
- The PRO-RES Framework for Ethical Evidence
In Detail
The PRO-RES Framework is built upon a set of resources that both help to generate ethical research and assess its integrity. The resources are operationalised in a toolbox that includes several means for assessing ethical research. The final ‘pillar’ in the PRO-RES Framework is ‘The Accord’ – a statement of principles for ethical evidence-gathering that individuals, agencies and organisations can sign up to as an assurance of their best intentions when gathering and using evidence to inform policies.
The Embassy editorial team, Iris Lechner, Signe Mezinska, Andrijana Perković Paloš, Ron Iphofen, Joshua Gualtieri contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Jul 03, 2023
