Difference between revisions of "Theme:74cc5c52-3073-4fef-8307-34a76326d665"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(mobo import migrateAll)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include:
 
However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include:
  
* Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy (2)
+
*Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy (2)
* Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation)
+
*Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation)
* Publishing on ‘hot topics’
+
*Publishing on ‘hot topics’
* Writing review papers (often more cited than original studies)
+
*Writing review papers (often more cited than original studies)
  
 
Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index.
 
Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index.
Line 16: Line 16:
 
|Has Reference=a
 
|Has Reference=a
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db
 +
}}
 
{{Tags}}
 
{{Tags}}

Revision as of 14:20, 22 May 2020

H-index

What is this about?

The h-index, introduced by Jorge Hirsch in 2005, is a metric that conveys both the productivity and citation impact of an individual researcher (1). If a researcher has a h-index of 5 then the researcher has 5 publications with 5 or more citations. A h-index of 75 means that there are 75 publications with 75 or more citations. It thus becomes progressively more difficult to increase one’s h-index, and h-indices are exponentially distributed among scientists.

Why is this important?

The h-index was partially introduced as an improvement over simply counting the quantity of a researcher’s publications. A researcher with 10 publications may have a higher h-index than a researcher with 100 publications.

However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include:

  • Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy (2)
  • Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation)
  • Publishing on ‘hot topics’
  • Writing review papers (often more cited than original studies)
Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6