Difference between revisions of "Theme:B4f3369c-e0ac-4cf5-acd9-cb2a6c11181d"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(mobo import migrateAll)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
*promoting research in bioethics and medical ethics,
 
*promoting research in bioethics and medical ethics,
 
*assisting in the harmonization of multidisciplinary ethical reviews.
 
*assisting in the harmonization of multidisciplinary ethical reviews.
|Important For=phd students
+
|Important For=Ethics committee members
 
|Has Reference=a
 
|Has Reference=a
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:8b7549d2-b1e4-433b-82fb-6af8f8ab8865
+
|Related To Resource=Resource:Afa6fbcc-ff3a-4c8e-985e-025f6f80ef81;Resource:B1ea257c-1121-4a1d-8921-72869c426a86
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108;Theme:9cc6d88e-a142-4741-834f-5d6aa7d06e3f
 +
}}
 +
{{Tags
 +
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability; Accountability
 +
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research ethics
 
}}
 
}}
{{Tags}}
 

Revision as of 12:11, 27 May 2020

European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)

What is this about?

EUREC (1) fosters cooperation between national associations of research ethics committees (RECs) throughout Europe. The network supports good ethical governance of research by providing a sustainable infrastructure for knowledge exchange and assisting capacity building initiatives. Moreover, EUREC links RECs with other relevant bodies involved in the ethical governance of research, like the European Commission’s ethical review system or the European Medical Association (EMA).

Why is this important?

RECs are responsible for the ethical review of research involving human participants, especially in the biomedical sciences. Today RECs face significant challenges due to the increase of multicenter studies and daring novel research.

Multicenter studies pose a challenge because RECs have evolved in accordance with local cultures and national laws. Reviewing research projects involving numerous institutions located in different countries requires cooperation between RECs because regulations and procedures need to be harmonized.

New technologies and research methodologies raise ethical questions, not only in the biomedical sciences, but also in the social sciences and the humanities. Often existing review procedures and guidelines cannot adequately address these challenges. Hence, there is a demand for adapting procedures and guidelines.

Striving to continuously improve the protection of human subjects and to ensure high quality ethical review of research projects, EUREC helps RECs addressing these challenges by:

  • providing a sustainable infrastructure for exchange and cooperation,
  • gathering and disseminating information on ethical review practices in Europe,
  • collecting and evaluating training materials for REC members,
  • conducting capacity building,
  • identifying emerging ethical issues,
  • promoting research in bioethics and medical ethics,
  • assisting in the harmonization of multidisciplinary ethical reviews.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6