Pages that link to "Important For:Peer-reviewers"
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages link to Important For:Peer-reviewers:
Displayed 19 items.
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition (← links)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities (← links)
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication (← links)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations (← links)
- Replicability in the Humanities (← links)
- Preprint servers (← links)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (← links)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance (← links)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill (← links)
- Handling self-admissions of fraud (← links)
- Image manipulation as a general practice (← links)
- New claim to authorship of published paper (← links)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ (← links)
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up (← links)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold (← links)
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility (← links)
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors (← links)
- A Famous Honesty Researcher Is Retracting A Study Over Fake Data (← links)
- The REAPPRAISED checklist to identify flawed papers (← links)