Difference between revisions of "Resource:Af266b39-20a3-4b97-a876-08eebb428fe6"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways. | |Important Because=The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Journal | ||
| + | |||
| + | Factual | ||
|Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders | |Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 19: | ||
|Involves=Marc Hauser | |Involves=Marc Hauser | ||
|Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | |Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct; Falsification | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct; Falsification | ||
|Related To Research Area=Psychology | |Related To Research Area=Psychology | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 28 April 2020
ResourcesCases
Misconduct ruling is silent on intent
What is this about?
Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct[1].
Why is this important?
The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.
Journal
