Difference between revisions of "Resource:15de5331-8dc3-4dba-8b81-5abcb412e698"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=But looking beyond the headlines, the repercussions of scientific misconduct also resonate on a more personal level<ref>https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(06)00249-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867406002492%3Fshowall%3Dtrue</ref>. | |Important Because=But looking beyond the headlines, the repercussions of scientific misconduct also resonate on a more personal level<ref>https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(06)00249-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867406002492%3Fshowall%3Dtrue</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Journal | ||
| + | |||
| + | Factual | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important For=researchers | |Important For=researchers | ||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Involves=Eric Poehlman; Gerald P. Schatten |
| + | |Has Timepoint=2000; 2005 | ||
| + | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication; Authorship; Honorary authorship |
| − | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | + | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine; Medical Biotechnology |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:22, 28 April 2020
ResourcesCases
The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
What is this about?
Scientific fraud became front-page news at the end of last year, when South Korean stem cell researcher, Woo Suk Hwang, admitted to fabricating data about cloned human embryonic stem cell lines that he claimed were created from patients. Much of the press coverage focused on the fallout of Hwang's actions on the public's trust in science and the already fragile image of stem cell research[1].
Why is this important?
But looking beyond the headlines, the repercussions of scientific misconduct also resonate on a more personal level[1].
Journal
Factual
