Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Final findings of scientific misconduct | |Title=Final findings of scientific misconduct | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Journal | ||
| + | |||
| + | Factual | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=Annmarie Surprenant | |Involves=Annmarie Surprenant | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct | ||
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 28 April 2020
ResourcesCases
Final findings of scientific misconduct
What is this about?
This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials.
Why is this important?
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
Journal
