Difference between revisions of "Resource:A9e1f468-b56b-4ae5-91fe-20024d43e154"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Title=Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control | |Title=Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control | ||
|Is About=This paper builds on the concepts of competing logics and institutional fields to analyze a serious case of medical and scientific misconduct at a leading research institute, Karolinska in Sweden, home to the Nobel Prize in Medicine<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub</ref>. | |Is About=This paper builds on the concepts of competing logics and institutional fields to analyze a serious case of medical and scientific misconduct at a leading research institute, Karolinska in Sweden, home to the Nobel Prize in Medicine<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This is a factual case. | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=The incidence of revealed fraud and dishonesty in academia is on the rise, and so is the number of studies seeking to explain scientific misconduct<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub</ref>. | |Important Because=The incidence of revealed fraud and dishonesty in academia is on the rise, and so is the number of studies seeking to explain scientific misconduct<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733318300817?via%3Dihub</ref>. | ||
| − | Journal | + | Journal<references /> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <references /> | ||
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | |Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 18 May 2020
ResourcesCases
Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control
What is this about?
This paper builds on the concepts of competing logics and institutional fields to analyze a serious case of medical and scientific misconduct at a leading research institute, Karolinska in Sweden, home to the Nobel Prize in Medicine[1].
This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
The incidence of revealed fraud and dishonesty in academia is on the rise, and so is the number of studies seeking to explain scientific misconduct[1].
