Difference between revisions of "Resource:9a3c7e5f-08d6-4de7-9acd-8304127300a3"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/research-ethics-3-ways-to-blow-the-whistle-1.14226 | |Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/research-ethics-3-ways-to-blow-the-whistle-1.14226 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
+ | |Related To Theme=Theme:Fe62e07c-2e75-4a55-82e6-1908fa543b7a | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Accountability | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Accountability | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Whistleblowing | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Whistleblowing | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 08:17, 26 May 2020
Resources
Cases
3 ways to blow the whistle
What is this about?
This is a factual case.