Difference between revisions of "Resource:569d9ce8-85a9-4494-8e9c-647cedaff2fd"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=The Future of Ethical Review in New Zealand |
|Is About=This report describes the system of ethical review that was adopted in New Zealand based on the fi ndings and recommendations from the Cartwright Inquiry in 1988<ref>Mcmillan, John, and Lynne Bowyer. "An Unfortunate Experiment?: The Future of Ethical Review in New Zealand." ''Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics'' 23.3 (2014): 268-271.</ref>. This is a factual case. | |Is About=This report describes the system of ethical review that was adopted in New Zealand based on the fi ndings and recommendations from the Cartwright Inquiry in 1988<ref>Mcmillan, John, and Lynne Bowyer. "An Unfortunate Experiment?: The Future of Ethical Review in New Zealand." ''Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics'' 23.3 (2014): 268-271.</ref>. This is a factual case. | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 08:54, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
The Future of Ethical Review in New Zealand
What is this about?
This report describes the system of ethical review that was adopted in New Zealand based on the fi ndings and recommendations from the Cartwright Inquiry in 1988[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Mcmillan, John, and Lynne Bowyer. "An Unfortunate Experiment?: The Future of Ethical Review in New Zealand." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23.3 (2014): 268-271.
Why is this important?
It discusses the changes made to this system under recent governmental initiatives enacted by the National Party, and some of the implications of those changes[1]
- ↑ Mcmillan, John, and Lynne Bowyer. "An Unfortunate Experiment?: The Future of Ethical Review in New Zealand." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23.3 (2014): 268-271.
