Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| + | |Related To Resource=Resource:F243f440-69e9-44f8-b95a-5e0c2009f700;Resource:8354ff67-9da4-4325-8395-d16e30059fb2 | ||
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | |Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:46, 4 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
What is this about?
This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
