Difference between revisions of "Resource:639f8445-2428-41df-8784-8c1a80a110f3"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true? |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=https:...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial |
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support. False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies. |
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Has Link=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(06)68445-6/fulltext?code=lancet-site | |Has Link=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(06)68445-6/fulltext?code=lancet-site | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:A1a1b736-7002-405c-8375-711a11f20e04 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Timepoint=2000 - 2006 | |Has Timepoint=2000 - 2006 | ||
| − | |Has Location=United Kingdom | + | |Has Location=United Kingdom; UK |
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Patient safety | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Patient safety | ||
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:55, 10 August 2020
ResourcesCases
False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial
What is this about?
A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support. False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies.
