Difference between revisions of "Resource:A6bae807-a521-46c4-a7ba-79c1fe163421"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Getting a Fair Shake? | |Title=Getting a Fair Shake? | ||
| − | |Is About=This fictional case is about an | + | |Is About=This fictional case is about an Associate Professor. She submitted a proposal which received a score too low to be funded. She is wondering what she should do now, because she is certain that her method will work. |
|Important Because=The current peer review system may not work positive for everybody. It is important how to react when your proposal as a researcher is rejected for funding without deception. | |Important Because=The current peer review system may not work positive for everybody. It is important how to react when your proposal as a researcher is rejected for funding without deception. | ||
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |Important For=Researchers; Funders; Peer reviewers |
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty |
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Communication; Research methods | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Communication; Research methods | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 13 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Getting a Fair Shake?
What is this about?
This fictional case is about an Associate Professor. She submitted a proposal which received a score too low to be funded. She is wondering what she should do now, because she is certain that her method will work.
Why is this important?
The current peer review system may not work positive for everybody. It is important how to react when your proposal as a researcher is rejected for funding without deception.
