Difference between revisions of "Resource:F5890da9-6097-411b-88ca-1496676325dc"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity |Is About=. |Important Because=. Website Factual Anonymized |Important...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity | |Title=Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=A complaint was made to the Executive Board at VU Amsterdam regarding a research report submitted by a researcher affiliated with the university but who produced the report in a personal capacity. Nevertheless, the report stated that the researcher carries out work with a VU Amsterdam research group. A subsequent petition was made to LOWI on the basis that the Executive Board had informed the complainants that it is not the university's responsibility to conduct an investigation or make statements about the research due to the fact that the assignment was issued to the author in a personal capacity. This is a factual anonymized case. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=It consider whether research in a personal capacity falls within the scope of a university's complaints procedure. |
| + | |Important For=Researchers; Research Ethics Committees; Research Integrity Officers; Administrators; Research institutions; Universities | ||
| + | |Has Best Practice=When a complaint is submitted to the Executive Board of a university, it is the Board's duty to forward the case to the university's research integrity office. | ||
| − | + | When researchers are commissioned to produced research in a personal capacity, the associated studies should explicitly state that the authors are working in a personal capacity. In addition, there should be no mention of their academic affiliations. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| − | |Has Link=https:// | + | |Has Link=https://lowi.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Summary-2018_08.pdf |
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:08, 25 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity
What is this about?
A complaint was made to the Executive Board at VU Amsterdam regarding a research report submitted by a researcher affiliated with the university but who produced the report in a personal capacity. Nevertheless, the report stated that the researcher carries out work with a VU Amsterdam research group. A subsequent petition was made to LOWI on the basis that the Executive Board had informed the complainants that it is not the university's responsibility to conduct an investigation or make statements about the research due to the fact that the assignment was issued to the author in a personal capacity. This is a factual anonymized case.
Why is this important?
It consider whether research in a personal capacity falls within the scope of a university's complaints procedure.
For whom is this important?
ResearchersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity OfficersAdministratorsResearch institutionsUniversities
What are the best practices?
When a complaint is submitted to the Executive Board of a university, it is the Board's duty to forward the case to the university's research integrity office.
When researchers are commissioned to produced research in a personal capacity, the associated studies should explicitly state that the authors are working in a personal capacity. In addition, there should be no mention of their academic affiliations.
