Difference between revisions of "Resource:8a2719e6-7498-40c5-96a8-be0e10a81e27"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Canaries in the Mines: Children, Risk, Non-Therapeutic Research, and Justice
 
|Title=Canaries in the Mines: Children, Risk, Non-Therapeutic Research, and Justice
|Is About=This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case discussing the Kennedy Krieger lead paint study where a United States Court of Appeals condemned what it called a “non-therapeutic research programme” using children. The court ruled that a parent cannot consent to the participation of a child in “non-therapeutic” research in the state of Maryland . The case involves issues that had been given little attention by the courts, such as children’s participation in research, proxy consent, and the duties of medical researchers towards their subjects. The analysis includes a discussion of the relevance of “therapeutic” versus “non-therapeutic,” importance and value of a study, as well as cost-benefit analysis, the design of the research, and study aims.
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 08:18, 12 September 2020

Cases

Canaries in the Mines: Children, Risk, Non-Therapeutic Research, and Justice

What is this about?

This is a factual case discussing the Kennedy Krieger lead paint study where a United States Court of Appeals condemned what it called a “non-therapeutic research programme” using children. The court ruled that a parent cannot consent to the participation of a child in “non-therapeutic” research in the state of Maryland . The case involves issues that had been given little attention by the courts, such as children’s participation in research, proxy consent, and the duties of medical researchers towards their subjects. The analysis includes a discussion of the relevance of “therapeutic” versus “non-therapeutic,” importance and value of a study, as well as cost-benefit analysis, the design of the research, and study aims.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6