Difference between revisions of "Resource:7bfab1c1-adcd-4e8b-b8e4-44f1f7b992c5"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
Line 16: Line 16:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=Daniel Andersen
 
 
|Has Timepoint=1992; 1994
 
|Has Timepoint=1992; 1994
 
|Has Location=Denmark
 
|Has Location=Denmark

Latest revision as of 17:36, 25 October 2020

Cases

From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark

What is this about?

In the 1990s, Denmark experienced cases of serious scientific fraud that had occurred many years ago. Some widely published cases from the United States motivated the Danish Medical Research Council to establish the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, a national committee covering the health sciences[1]. This is a factual anonymized case.

  1. Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." Science and engineering ethics 6.1 (2000): 25-34.

Why is this important?

This case highlights the importance of involving diverse actors in misconduct investigations. The article explains that it was considered important to represent a broad spectrum of health sciences on the committee because decisions on honesty/dishonesty due to their inherently inexact and judgmental nature must reflect the general culture of the research environment.[1]

  1. Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." Science and engineering ethics 6.1 (2000): 25-34.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6