Difference between revisions of "Resource:Af2f0202-71bd-4cf4-9213-8fb255e1674c"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Is About=The paper presents the case of Zhejiang University in China where plagiarism, fabrication and falsification was discovered by the new president who is now educating about scientific integrity in China. This is a factual case.
 
|Is About=The paper presents the case of Zhejiang University in China where plagiarism, fabrication and falsification was discovered by the new president who is now educating about scientific integrity in China. This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=There are no comprehensive statistics on the extent of research misconduct in China — and few ministries, agencies or universities make cases public. Surveys and anecdotal evidence, however, reveal a deep-rooted problem, and suggest that students are learning unethical behaviour alongside their science.
 
|Important Because=There are no comprehensive statistics on the extent of research misconduct in China — and few ministries, agencies or universities make cases public. Surveys and anecdotal evidence, however, reveal a deep-rooted problem, and suggest that students are learning unethical behaviour alongside their science.
|Important For=Researchers
+
|Important For=Researchers; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Journal publishers
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
Line 14: Line 14:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=He Haibo; Li Lianda; Yang Wei
 
 
|Has Timepoint=2008
 
|Has Timepoint=2008
 
|Has Location=China
 
|Has Location=China

Latest revision as of 17:59, 25 October 2020

Cases

Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance

What is this about?

The paper presents the case of Zhejiang University in China where plagiarism, fabrication and falsification was discovered by the new president who is now educating about scientific integrity in China. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

There are no comprehensive statistics on the extent of research misconduct in China — and few ministries, agencies or universities make cases public. Surveys and anecdotal evidence, however, reveal a deep-rooted problem, and suggest that students are learning unethical behaviour alongside their science.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6