Difference between revisions of "Resource:2bbdffa2-234c-4cbc-a087-94c1681d19d9"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Being the Ghost in the Machine: A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View |Is About=. |Important Because=. Journal Factual Anonymi...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View |
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This is a factual anonymized case about a person who worked as a medical writer for almost 11 years. During this time she has written a variety of texts including the occasional ghostwritten article. In the article she describes her experience, motivation and her views about the problem of fraud in authorship. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=This is a real case which might be useful for discussions on ghost authorship. |
| − | + | |Important For=Researchers; PhD Students; Research integrity trainers; medical researchers | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001071 | |Has Link=https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001071 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:Cbe88760-7f0e-4d6d-952b-b724bb0f375e;Theme:540f8241-c354-4249-8b63-6bdc2e74bdf8;Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db | ||
| + | |Related To Instruction=Instruction:6cc77174-4f7b-48a6-95f3-eeb4dadcb0a3 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Timepoint=2000 | |Has Timepoint=2000 | ||
|Has Location=United States | |Has Location=United States | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Integrity; Professional courtesy and fairness |
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Authorship; Ghostwriting; Ghost authorship | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Authorship; Ghostwriting; Ghost authorship | ||
|Related To Research Area=Clinical Medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical Medicine | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:47, 7 February 2021
ResourcesCases
A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View
What is this about?
This is a factual anonymized case about a person who worked as a medical writer for almost 11 years. During this time she has written a variety of texts including the occasional ghostwritten article. In the article she describes her experience, motivation and her views about the problem of fraud in authorship.
Why is this important?
This is a real case which might be useful for discussions on ghost authorship.
