Difference between revisions of "Resource:45c88d4b-9956-4b4f-9bfc-7095b6340195"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=Seven Ways to | + | |Title=Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section |
|Is About=This is the factual scenario of a grant applicant who copied the background section of another professor’s published work without the appropriate referencing and credits. | |Is About=This is the factual scenario of a grant applicant who copied the background section of another professor’s published work without the appropriate referencing and credits. | ||
|Important Because=Another factual anonymised case added to this illuminating collection of plagiarism types which was inspired by cases that an academic member of University encountered in his role as a research integrity officer. | |Important Because=Another factual anonymised case added to this illuminating collection of plagiarism types which was inspired by cases that an academic member of University encountered in his role as a research integrity officer. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:25, 5 March 2021
ResourcesCases
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
What is this about?
This is the factual scenario of a grant applicant who copied the background section of another professor’s published work without the appropriate referencing and credits.
Why is this important?
Another factual anonymised case added to this illuminating collection of plagiarism types which was inspired by cases that an academic member of University encountered in his role as a research integrity officer.
This particular case highlights the fact that writing of a background section also constitutes intellectual effort (reviewing of available literature and synthesis towards an argument) and should therefore acknowledged and referenced appropriately.
It also provides another example of the possible outcomes of investigation of plagiarism allegations.
